Knowledge Graphs for Intelligent Data Integration Systems

  • Authors

    • Dr. Muhammad Al-Azar Department of Computer Science, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30713498/IJADSMC-2020PII3M9B

    Published 08-05-2020

  • Knowledge Graphs, Data Integration, Semantic Web, Rdf, Ontology, Intelligent Systems, Graph Databases, Data Interoperability, Entity Resolution, Semantic Reasoning

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    M. Al-Azar, “Knowledge Graphs for Intelligent Data Integration Systems”, IJADSMC, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 01–15, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.67228/30713498/IJADSMC-2020PII3M9B.
  • Abstract

    The increasing presence of heterogeneous data sources in modern information systems has intensified the need for intelligent data integration processes capable of handling semantic complexity, structural diversity, and dynamic changes. Traditional data integration methods, primarily based on relational schemas and syntactic mappings, struggle to address semantic heterogeneity in large-scale distributed environments. Knowledge graphs have emerged as a powerful paradigm, enabling semantically rich, flexible, and scalable integration by representing data as interconnected entities with metadata, ontologies, and inference capabilities. Using technologies such as RDF and OWL, knowledge graphs support interoperability, contextual reasoning, and unified data views across systems. This paper examines knowledge graph-based intelligent data integration systems, focusing on their architecture, methodology, and practical applications. It highlights their advantages in schema alignment, entity resolution, and semantic enrichment over traditional ETL approaches. The integration of machine learning techniques further enhances automation in data mapping, anomaly detection, and knowledge discovery. A systematic framework is proposed, covering ontology design, data ingestion, graph construction, and query optimization. A conceptual case study demonstrates improved integration accuracy, scalability, and query performance. Evaluation results indicate enhanced data quality, interoperability, and reasoning capabilities, along with reduced integration latency. Overall, knowledge graphs serve as a key enabler for next-generation intelligent data integration, supporting complex relationships and data-driven decision-making. Future work includes improving scalability, real-time processing, and integration with deep learning models.

  • References

    [1] Inmon, W. H. (2005). Building the Data Warehouse (4th ed.). Wiley.

    [2] Kimball, R., & Ross, M. (2013). The Data Warehouse Toolkit: The Definitive Guide to Dimensional Modeling (3rd ed.). Wiley.

    [3] Sheth, A., & Larson, J. A. (1990). Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3), 183–236.

    [4] Vassiliadis, P. (2009). A survey of Extract–Transform–Load technology. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining, 5(3), 1–27.

    [5] Tim Berners-Lee, Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34–43.

    [6] Klyne, G., & Carroll, J. J. (2004). Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. W3C Recommendation.

    [7] McGuinness, D. L., & van Harmelen, F. (2004). OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation.

    [8] Prud’hommeaux, E., & Seaborne, A. (2008). SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommendation.

    [9] Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., et al. (2007). DBpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. The Semantic Web.

    [10] Christian Bizer, Heath, T., & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked Data – The Story So Far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1–22.

    [11] Fabian M. Suchanek, Kasneci, G., & Weikum, G. (2007). YAGO: A core of semantic knowledge. WWW Conference.

    [12] Nickles, M., & Wolfgang Nejdl (2012). Knowledge graphs and their applications. IEEE Intelligent Systems.

    [13] Christen, P. (2012). Data Matching: Concepts and Techniques for Record Linkage, Entity Resolution, and Duplicate Detection. Springer.

    [14] Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017). Knowledge graph embedding: A survey of approaches and applications. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(12), 2724–2743.

    [15] Paulheim, H. (2017). Knowledge graph refinement: A survey of approaches and evaluation methods. Semantic Web Journal, 8(3), 489–508.

  • Downloads