Large Language Model Integration for Enterprise Knowledge Management Platforms

  • Authors

    • Mr. Farhan Malik IT Manager, Systems Limited, Pakistan. Author
    • Ms. Zara Ahmed Business Development Manager, Engro Corporation, Pakistan. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30713498/IJADSMC-2025PI8M2D

    Published 05-05-2025

  • Large Language Models (LLMs), Enterprise Knowledge Management, Artificial Intelligence, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Semantic Search, Knowledge Discovery, Transformer Models, Enterprise AI

    Issue

    Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    F. Malik and Z. Ahmed, “Large Language Model Integration for Enterprise Knowledge Management Platforms”, IJADSMC, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 01–17, May 2025, doi: 10.67228/30713498/IJADSMC-2025PI8M2D.

  • Abstract

    Enterprise Knowledge Management Platforms (EKMPs) help organizations capture, organize, share, and utilize knowledge to improve decision-making and operational efficiency. Traditional knowledge management systems often face challenges such as data silos, unstructured information, limited contextual understanding, and ineffective search capabilities. The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) addresses these limitations by enabling intelligent search, semantic understanding, automated content generation, and conversational interfaces. This study proposes an LLM-powered knowledge management framework that combines Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), semantic embeddings, enterprise-specific language models, and vector databases to transform enterprise data into actionable knowledge. The framework includes data ingestion pipelines, knowledge repositories, embedding generation modules, retrieval systems, and conversational AI interfaces while emphasizing security, privacy, governance, scalability, and explainability. It also addresses challenges such as hallucination reduction, domain adaptation, and knowledge freshness. Experimental results demonstrate that LLM-based systems significantly improve retrieval accuracy, response relevance, knowledge reuse, and user satisfaction compared with traditional keyword-based approaches. These advancements enhance employee productivity, decision quality, collaboration, and innovation, positioning LLM-driven knowledge management systems as a key enabler of enterprise digital transformation.

  • References

    [1] T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 1998.

    [2] I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    [3] T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, “The Semantic Web,” Scientific American, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 34–43, 2001.

    [4] M. Uschold and M. Gruninger, “Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications,” Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 93–136, 1996.

    [5] J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, “MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2008.

    [6] A. Vaswani et al., “Attention Is All You Need,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017, pp. 5998–6008.

    [7] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” in Proc. NAACL-HLT, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2019, pp. 4171–4186.

    [8] T. B. Brown et al., “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, 2020, pp. 1877–1901.

    [9] C. Raffel et al., “Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020.

    [10] H. Touvron et al., “LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models,” arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.

    [11] P. Lewis et al., “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), vol. 33, 2020, pp. 9459–9474.

    [12] S. Karpukhin et al., “Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering,” in Proc. EMNLP, Online, 2020, pp. 6769–6781.

    [13] Y. Liu et al., “RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach,” arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.

    [14] M. Bommasani et al., “On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models,” Stanford Center for Research on Foundation Models, Tech. Rep., 2021.

    [15] S. Thirunavukarasu, M. Hassan, E. Mahmood, and M. A. M. Shah, “Large Language Models in Enterprise Knowledge Management: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 45678–45695, 2024.

    [16] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820.

    [17] Gajula, S. (2024). Adaptive zero trust architecture for securing financial microservices. Computer Fraud & Security, 2024(12), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.845

    [18] Gajula, S. (2024). Cybersecurity risk prediction using graph neural networks. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.

  • Downloads