Scalable Machine Learning Models for High-Dimensional Datasets

  • Authors

    • Prof. Liam O’Connor Faculty of Science and Technology, Durham College, Whitby, Canada. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30713498/IJADSMC-2018PI5X1D

    Published 05-04-2018

  • High-Dimensional Data, Scalable Machine Learning, Dimensionality Reduction, Distributed Learning, Sparse Models, Big Data Analytics, Optimization, Feature Selection

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    L. O’Connor, “Scalable Machine Learning Models for High-Dimensional Datasets”, IJADSMC, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–14, May 2018, doi: 10.67228/30713498/IJADSMC-2018PI5X1D.
  • Abstract

    The phenomenal growth in the use of data-intensive applications in areas including bioinformatics, computer vision, cybersecurity, finance, and natural language processing has resulted in the recent essential expansion of high-dimensional data sets with vast amounts of features, variables, or attributes. Although such datasets offer greater representational power and enhanced modeling expressiveness, they also introduce significant computational, statistical, and algorithmic complexity. Classical machine learning models developed for moderate-dimensional data often experience degradation in performance, scalability, and generalization in high-dimensional spaces due to the curse of dimensionality, leading to increased computational cost, overfitting, sparsity challenges, and reduced interpretability. To address these issues, scalable machine learning has emerged as a critical research area focusing on algorithmic efficiency, distributed learning, dimensionality reduction, and regularization strategies. Modern scalable approaches integrate optimization theory, parallel computing, and representation learning to efficiently process large high-dimensional datasets. Techniques such as sparse learning, ensemble-based dimensional decomposition, kernel approximation, and deep representation learning provide a balance between scalability and predictive accuracy. This paper presents a systematic analysis of scalable machine learning models for high-dimensional data, outlining structural challenges, reviewing scalable learning paradigms, and proposing a unified methodological framework that integrates feature reduction, model parallelism, and adaptive optimization. Using multiple benchmark datasets, we evaluate trade-offs among accuracy, computational efficiency, and scalability. Experimental results show that hybrid frameworks combining dimensionality reduction with distributed learning outperform standalone methods in both predictive performance and runtime efficiency. The paper contributes (i) a hierarchical taxonomy of scalable learning strategies for high-dimensional data, (ii) a modular methodological framework for scalable deployment, and (iii) an empirical evaluation supporting practical adoption by researchers and practitioners.

  • References

    [1] T. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2002.

    [2] R. A. Fisher, “The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems,” Annals of Eugenics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 179–188, 1936.

    [3] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009.

    [4] R. Tibshirani, “Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 267–288, 1996.

    [5] E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, “Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems,” Technometrics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–67, 1970.

    [6] L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001.

    [7] Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting,” Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119–139, 1997.

    [8] C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 273–297, 1995.

    [9] B. Schölkopf and A. J. Smola, Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2002.

    [10] Rahimi and B. Recht, “Random features for large-scale kernel machines,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2007, pp. 1177–1184.

    [11] J. C. Platt, “Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines,” Microsoft Research, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-98-14, 1998.

    [12] J. Dean et al., “Large scale distributed deep networks,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2012, pp. 1223–1231.

    [13] M. Li et al., “Scaling distributed machine learning with the parameter server,” in Proc. 11th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2014, pp. 583–598.

    [14] B. Recht et al., “Hogwild!: A lock-free approach to parallelizing stochastic gradient descent,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2011, pp. 693–701.

    [15] J. Konečný, H. B. McMahan, and D. Ramage, “Federated optimization: Distributed machine learning for on-device intelligence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02527, 2016.

  • Downloads