Federated Learning for Cross‐Institution Credit Scoring under Privacy Constraints

  • Authors

    • Wang Li Data Science Manager, Alibaba Group, China. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071642X/IJCFDE-2018PI4G1K

    Published 02-04-2018

  • Federated Learning, Credit Scoring, Privacy Preservation, Cross-Institution Collaboration, Differential Privacy, Secure Aggregation, Financial Technology (Fintech), Machine Learning, Data Privacy, Regulatory Compliance

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    Li, W. (2018). Federated Learning for Cross‐Institution Credit Scoring under Privacy Constraints. International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy, 1(1), 01-12. https://doi.org/10.67228/3071642X/IJCFDE-2018PI4G1K
  • Abstract

    In recent years, credit scoring has become a critical tool for financial institutions to assess the creditworthiness of individuals and businesses. However, accurate credit scoring often requires access to large, diverse datasets from multiple institutions, which raises significant privacy and regulatory challenges. This paper proposes a federated learning framework for cross-institution credit scoring that enables collaborative model training without sharing raw data, thereby preserving user privacy under stringent regulatory constraints. Our approach incorporates privacy-enhancing techniques such as differential privacy and secure aggregation to mitigate data leakage risks. Experimental results on real-world credit datasets demonstrate that the proposed federated model achieves comparable accuracy to centralized training while adhering to privacy requirements. The study highlights the potential of federated learning to revolutionize credit scoring by enabling secure, scalable, and privacy-compliant cooperation among financial institutions.

  • References

    [1] McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS).

    [2] Shokri, R., & Shmatikov, V. (2015). Privacy-preserving deep learning. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security.

    [3] Dwork, C. (2008). Differential privacy: A survey of results. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation.

    [4] Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., et al. (2018). Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03604.

    [5] Bellotti, T., & Crook, J. (2009). Support vector machines for credit scoring and discovery of significant features. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 3302-3308.

    [6] Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 3315-3323.

    [7] Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., et al. (2017). Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security.

    [8] Smith, V., Chiang, C. K., Sanjabi, M., & Talwalkar, A. (2017). Federated multi-task learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4424-4434.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

11-20 of 90

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.