Adversarial Robustness in ML Models for Detecting Synthetic Identity Fraud in Credit Risk
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/3071642X/IJCFDE-2018PI6I3LPublished 03-02-2018
Synthetic Identity Fraud, Credit Risk, Machine Learning, Adversarial Robustness, Fraud Detection, Adversarial Attacks, Adversarial Training, Financial Cybersecurity, Model Defense, Robust Feature Engineering Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
Singh, A. K., & Narayanan, L. (2018). Adversarial Robustness in ML Models for Detecting Synthetic Identity Fraud in Credit Risk. International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy, 1(1), 01-11. https://doi.org/10.67228/3071642X/IJCFDE-2018PI6I3LAbstract
Synthetic identity fraud represents a growing threat in credit risk management, where attackers create fictitious identities by combining real and fabricated information to bypass traditional detection systems. Machine learning models have demonstrated effectiveness in detecting such fraudulent activities; however, they remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can manipulate input data to evade detection. This paper investigates the adversarial robustness of various machine learning models applied to synthetic identity fraud detection in credit risk settings. We simulate diverse adversarial attack strategies on benchmark datasets and evaluate the impact on model performance, highlighting critical vulnerabilities. Furthermore, we propose and assess defense mechanisms, including adversarial training and robust feature engineering, to enhance model resilience. Our results reveal significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, underscoring the need for balanced solutions tailored to financial fraud contexts. The study provides actionable insights for practitioners aiming to deploy more secure and trustworthy fraud detection systems, contributing to improved credit risk management in an increasingly adversarial environment.
References
[1] Biggio, B., & Roli, F. (2018). Wild Patterns: Ten Years After the Rise of Adversarial Machine Learning. Pattern Recognition, 84, 317–331.
[2] Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
[3] Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Jha, S., Fredrikson, M., Celik, Z. B., & Swami, A. (2016). The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings. IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy.
[4] Huang, L., Joseph, A. D., Nelson, B., Rubinstein, B. I., & Tygar, J. D. (2011). Adversarial Machine Learning. Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Security and Artificial Intelligence.
[5] Dalvi, N., Domingos, P., Mausam, Sanghai, S., & Verma, D. (2004). Adversarial Classification. Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
[6] Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., & Vladu, A. (2018). Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
[7] Tramèr, F., Kurakin, A., Papernot, N., Goodfellow, I., Boneh, D., & McDaniel, P. (2018). Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defenses. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).
[8] Sethi, T., & Kantardzic, M. (2018). Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Synthetic Identity Fraud Detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 94, 295–310.
[9] Lowd, D., & Meek, C. (2005). Adversarial Learning. Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining.
[10] Barreno, M., Nelson, B., Joseph, A. D., & Tygar, J. D. (2010). The Security of Machine Learning. Machine Learning, 81(2), 121–148.
Downloads
How to Cite
Singh, A. K., & Narayanan, L. (2018). Adversarial Robustness in ML Models for Detecting Synthetic Identity Fraud in Credit Risk. International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy, 1(1), 01-11. https://doi.org/10.67228/3071642X/IJCFDE-2018PI6I3L
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Smart Contracts for Automated Financial Transactions , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
Similar Articles
- N. Seshagiri, H. N. Mahabala, Predictive Modeling for Stock Market Volatility , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- David Thompson, Graph Neural Networks for Interconnected Default Risk in Supply Chain Finance Portfolios , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018)
- Noah Wright, Isabella Moore, Fraud Detection in Online Banking Using Machine Learning , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- Dr. Ali Reza, Dr. Maria Gonzalez, Biometric Authentication for Secure Digital Banking , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- Narendra Karmarkar, Time Series Analysis for Commodity Price Forecasting , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
- Wang Li, Federated Learning for Cross‐Institution Credit Scoring under Privacy Constraints , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018)
- Narendra Karmarkar, Quantum Computing Applications in Financial Modeling , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
- N. Seshagiri, Big Data Analytics in Corporate Financial Planning , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
- Marco Bianchi, Business Forecasting Using Machine Learning Algorithms , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- Jose Fernandez, Marta Silva, Digital Lending Platforms and their Impact on SME Financing , International Journal of Commerce, Finance and Digital Economy: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.