Metadata-Centric Semantic Layer Management in Multi-Domain Pipelines

  • Authors

    • Kathleen Booth Research Scientist, Birkbeck College, United Kingdom. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715717/IJDEIC-2023PI4K3Q

    Published 03-10-2023

  • Multi-Domain Pipelines, Data Governance, Data Mesh, Knowledge Graphs, Active Metadata, Data Lineage, Semantic Interoperability, Federated Data Architecture

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    K. Booth, “Metadata-Centric Semantic Layer Management in Multi-Domain Pipelines”, IJDEIC, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 01–09, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.67228/30715717/IJDEIC-2023PI4K3Q.
  • Abstract

    In modern data-driven ecosystems, multi-domain data pipelines present significant challenges in terms of interoperability, scalability, governance, and semantic consistency. Traditional data integration methods often falter when faced with the heterogeneity and velocity of domain-specific data. This paper proposes a metadata-centric approach to managing the semantic layer in multi-domain data pipelines. By elevating metadata to a first-class citizen, organizations can dynamically model, interpret, and govern data semantics across domains without excessive data movement or manual schema alignment. We introduce a reference architecture and management framework that leverages active metadata, semantic annotations, knowledge graphs, and policy-driven governance to enable scalable, federated analytics. Case studies and experimental evaluation demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach in improving query performance, data lineage traceability, and cross-domain interoperability. The proposed methodology aligns with modern data mesh principles and promotes sustainable data infrastructure design.

  • References

    [1] Newman, D. (2022). Data Fabric vs. Data Mesh: What's the Difference? Forbes.

    [2] Dehghani, Z. (2022). Data Mesh: Delivering Data-Driven Value at Scale. O'Reilly Media.

    [3] W3C. (2014). RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/

    [4] W3C. (2012). OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/

    [5] W3C. (2017). SHACL - Shapes Constraint Language. https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/

    [6] Gartner. (2021). Innovation Insight for Active Metadata Management.

    [7] DAMA International. (2017). The DAMA Guide to the Data Management Body of Knowledge (DAMA-DMBOK).

    [8] Hasnain, A., et al. (2017). "Linked Data in Data Governance." Journal of Web Semantics, 43, 1–18.

    [9] Cheung, K., et al. (2019). "Semantic Models for Data Integration in Healthcare." IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 23(5), 2224–2235.

    [10] Noy, N. F., et al. (2001). "Ontology Development 101." Stanford Knowledge Systems Lab.

    [11] Singh, M., & Rani, A. (2020). "Metadata Management in Big Data: A Review." Big Data Research, 22, 100157.

    [12] Curino, C., et al. (2013). "DataHub: Collaborative Data Science & Metadata Management." CIDR 2013.

  • Downloads