The Impact of Digital Transformation on Contemporary Humanities Research

  • Authors

    • Aruna S Research scholar, Department of IT, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Author
    • Yamuna Devi J Research scholar, Department of IT, PSG College of Arts and Science, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2018PI9D1L

    Published 05-04-2018

  • Digital Humanities, Computational Humanities, Cultural Analytics, Text Mining, Digital Archives, Research Methodology, Interdisciplinary Scholarship

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    A. S and Y. Devi, “The Impact of Digital Transformation on Contemporary Humanities Research”, IJIRHT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–13, May 2018, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2018PI9D1L.
  • Abstract

    The digital turn has both radically altered the epistemological guiding principles, methodologies and forms of dissemination of current humanities studies. The humanities have had a traditionally qualitative and interpretative grounding, involving close reading and archival research; however, it has been supplemented notably by computational tools, massive digital corporates, and dataprojects that rely on data analytics. The paradigm shift, which is commonly summarised as the digital humanities, has facilitated a situation where scholars are now able to question culture, history and literary phenomena on a greater scale and intricacy than before. The paper offers a profound analysis of how digital transformation affects the modern humanities research. It combines interdisciplinary literature in digital humanities, information science, cultural analytics and computational social science. This paper examines how digitization, algorithm techniques and networked infrastructures have increased the possibilities of research and inhalated new epistemic, ethical and interpretative predicaments at the same time. Digital archives, text mining, spatial humanities, network analysis, and collaboration research platforms are some of the key areas of transformation. The proposed methodological framework contains five dimensions of measuring digital transformation, namely data acquisition, analytical methods, interpretive validity, scholarly collaboration, and dissemination of research. Testing The empirical findings of the case-based analysis indicate remarkable improvement in research scalability, reproducibility, and interdisciplinarity. Nonetheless, their issues associated with algorithmic bias, the loss of context, and asymmetrical access to digital content continue to exist. These results indicate that digital transformation can not substitute the classic humanities research but can enrich it with hybrid approaches, which combine computational rigor with humanistic comprehension. The paper ends with a description of the future research directions, including ethical AI, explainable computational models and sustainable digital infrastructures of humanities research.

  • References

    [1] S. Hockey, Electronic Texts in the Humanities: Principles and Practice. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000.

    [2] M. McCarty, Humanities Computing. London, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

    [3] J. Schreibman, R. Siemens, and J. Unsworth, A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.

    [4] F. Moretti, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London, U.K.: Verso, 2005.

    [5] M. Jockers, Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana, IL, USA: Univ. of Illinois Press, 2013.

    [6] D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, “Latent Dirichlet allocation,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 3, pp. 993–1022, 2003.

    [7] P. Manning, C. D. Manning, and H. Schütze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1999.

    [8] T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, “The semantic web,” Scientific American, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 34–43, 2001.

    [9] C. Borgman, Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2007.

    [10] M. Terras, J. Nyhan, and E. Vanhoutte, Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Farnham, U.K.: Ashgate Publishing, 2013.

    [11] S. Drucker, “Humanities approaches to graphical display,” Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2011.

    [12] N. K. Hayles, “How we think: Transforming power and digital technologies,” in Understanding Digital Humanities, New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 42–66, 2012.

  • Downloads