Technology-Driven Trends in Modern Art and Design

  • Authors

    • Noah Wright Data Engineering Lead, SAP, Germany. Author
    • Isabella Moore HR Director, Siemens, Germany. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2023PI4U4G

    Published 05-04-2023

  • Digital Art, Artificial Intelligence, Generative Design, Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, NFTs, Computational Creativity, Human-Computer Interaction, Interactive Design, Blockchain in Art

    Issue

    Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    N. Wright and I. Moore, “Technology-Driven Trends in Modern Art and Design”, IJIRHT, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 01–12, May 2023, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2023PI4U4G.

  • Abstract

    The blistering development of the digital technologies has changed the modern art and design landscape greatly, changing the way creative works are developed, expressed, and interacted with the audience. In this paper, the author examines the introduction of new technologies into the modern art scene: artificial intelligence (AI), virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), blockchain, and generative algorithms. These technological progressions have not only widened the horizon of creativity, but have democratized the process of producing and distributing art thereby allowing artists to tap into audiences all over the world without having to go through the traditional go-between. The research examines the impact of digital tools and platforms on artistic processes, aesthetics and conceptualization. It puts the emphasis on the transformation of passive to active and participatory experiences, in which the audiences become actively involved in creating and understanding the works of art. Also, the paper analyses how data-driven design, computational creativity and machine learning are used to create new forms of art that defy the conventional concept of authorship and originality. Moreover, this study examines socio-cultural effects of technology-based art, such as concerns with intellectual property, authenticity, as well as problems of ethics of AI-generated art. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) have brought about novel economics and artists can earn revenue on digital art at the cost of sustainability and financial instability. The research approach will include the mixed-method one that will include the qualitative analysis of case studies with the help of quantitative surveys of artists and designers. The results indicate that technology boosts both effective creativity and cross-disciplinary teamwork and allows new expressions of creativity. Digital dependence, accessibility obstacles and ethical dilemmas are among the problems that have remained. The paper then wraps up by restating the necessity of a moderated adoption of technology and human imaginative in such a way that the technological equipment becomes facilitators of the artistic expression and not substitutes. The research directions in the future are to find a sustainable way of engaging in digital art and creating a framework of the ethical use of AI in the creative field.

  • References

    [1] L. Manovich, The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2001.

    [2] C. Paul, Digital Art, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: Thames & Hudson, 2015.

    [3] M. Rush, New Media in Art, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Thames & Hudson, 2005.

    [4] S. Candy and E. Edmonds, “Practice-based research in the creative arts: Foundations and futures from the front line,” Leonardo, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 63–69, 2018.

    [5] I. Goodfellow et al., “Generative adversarial nets,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2014, pp. 2672–2680.

    [6] L. A. Gatys, A. S. Ecker, and M. Bethge, “A neural algorithm of artistic style,” J. Vis., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 326–326, 2016.

    [7] A. Elgammal et al., “CAN: Creative adversarial networks, generating ‘art’ by learning about styles and deviating from style norms,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Computational Creativity, 2017.

    [8] O. Grau, Virtual Art: From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2003.

    [9] M. Slater and M. V. Sanchez-Vives, “Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 3, pp. 74–89, 2016.

    [10] R. T. Azuma, “A survey of augmented reality,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, 1997.

    [11] S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” 2008.

    [12] K. J. P. Wang, “Non-fungible tokens (NFTs): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges,” Business Horizons, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 657–670, 2022.

    [13] A. Whitaker, “Art and blockchain: A primer, history, and taxonomy of blockchain use cases in the arts,” Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 21–46, 2019.

    [14] P. B. F. Nake, “Generative art: Theory and practice,” Computers & Graphics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 201–206, 2011.

    [15] C. Reas and B. Fry, Processing: A Programming Handbook for Visual Designers and Artists. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2007.

  • Downloads