ChatGPT and the Future of Creative Writing
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PI2X9RPublished 02-04-2022
Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, Creative Writing, Natural Language Processing, AI-Assisted Writing, Digital Storytelling, Human–AI Collaboration, Language Models Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]G. Ndlovu, “ChatGPT and the Future of Creative Writing”, IJIRHT, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PI2X9R.Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly tools like ChatGPT, has significantly transformed digital content creation and creative writing. Traditionally viewed as a deeply human activity requiring imagination, emotion, and originality, creative writing is now increasingly supported by AI systems capable of generating coherent and stylistically diverse text. This paper examines ChatGPT’s role in shaping the future of creative writing by analyzing its applications, advantages, limitations, and ethical concerns. AI-assisted tools help writers with idea generation, plot development, drafting, and experimenting with different writing styles, improving both productivity and creativity. However, challenges such as originality, authorship, intellectual property, and overreliance on AI remain critical concerns. While AI can enhance the writing process, it may also impact traditional notions of creativity and human expression. The study concludes that the future of creative writing will likely involve a collaborative relationship between humans and AI. Rather than replacing human creativity, tools like ChatGPT act as supportive technologies that expand creative possibilities. Ethical and responsible use of AI will be essential to maintain authenticity and artistic value in literature as its role continues to grow in education, publishing, and digital storytelling.
References
[1] Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623.
[2] Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901.
[3] Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 4171–4186.
[4] Floridi, L., & Chiriatti, M. (2020). GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences. Minds and Machines, 30(4), 681–694.
[5] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
[6] McKee, R. (1997). Story: Substance, Structure, Style, and the Principles of Screenwriting. HarperCollins.
[7] Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., & Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Technical Report.
[8] Shardlow, M., & Bhowmick, A. (2021). AI-assisted writing: Challenges and opportunities in the digital age. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 70, 857–884.
[9] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
[10] Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W. H. Freeman.
[11] Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Rashkin, H., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., Roesner, F., & Choi, Y. (2019). Defending against neural fake news. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
[12] Zhang, Y., Sun, S., Galley, M., Chen, Y., Brockett, C., Gao, X., et al. (2020). DialoGPT: Large-scale generative pre-training for conversational response generation. Proceedings of ACL, 270–278.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]G. Ndlovu, “ChatGPT and the Future of Creative Writing”, IJIRHT, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PI2X9R.