The Role of Online Forums in Shaping Public Discourse

  • Authors

    • Dr. Cat Pause Senior Lecturer, Massey University, New Zealand. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PII3J9S

    Published 12-04-2022

  • Microservices Architecture, Observability, Monitoring Systems, Distributed Tracing, DevOps, Cloud Computing, Telemetry Data, Reliability Engineering, System Diagnostics, Distributed Systems

    Issue

    Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    C. Pause, “The Role of Online Forums in Shaping Public Discourse”, IJIRHT, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 01–12, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PII3J9S.

  • Abstract

    The advent of digital communication technologies has made the sphere of communication evolve quite rapidly, which is the fundamental aspect of the way people are stimulated to hold the public discourse. Of these technologies, the online forums have become important platforms of deliberation, forming opinions, and information exchange. The paper will discuss how the online forums shape the discourse of the people based on their structure, social, and algorithmic dynamics. The online forums are different and decentralized as well as participatory in nature in contrast to the traditional media because users have possession and influence to the discourse, in political, social and cultural spheres. This paper explores the benefits of online forums in facilitating the democratization of communication, and at the same time, it presents the issue of misinformation, echo-chamber communication, and polarization. Combining qualitative content analysis and quantitative indicators of engagement allows the study to assess the degree of impact forums have on the formation of an opinion and decision-making process by the population. The methodology will entail sampling data where various platforms (general discussion forums, niche communities and moderated bodies of knowledge sharing) can be sampled. It has been found out that online forums can play a very substantial role in discourse, increasing the voices of varying levels, allowing live responses, and constructing knowledge on a community basis. Nevertheless, due to the lack of rigid moderation and the effects of algorithmic visibility in general, the selected discourse patterns tend to be biased. Another aspect that has been brought out in the study is the role of anonymity in enhancing participation as well as diminishing accountability, which in turn influences the quality of discussions. Moreover, the study presents a conceptual model whereby the architecture of the forum, the behavior of the users and the outcomes of the discourse are correlated. The findings indicate that though online discussions lead to strengthening democracy, they require better governance systems that facilitate beneficial participation. On the concluding part of the paper the author gives recommendations on what platform designers, policymakers, and researchers should ensure to maximize the utility of online forums in terms of creating informed and inclusive public discourse.

  • References

    [1] J. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1989.

    [2] H. Rheingold, The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 1993.

    [3] B. Wellman and M. Gulia, “Net surfers don’t ride alone: Virtual communities as communities,” in Networks in the Global Village, Boulder, CO, USA: Westview Press, 1999, pp. 331–366.

    [4] S. Papacharissi, “The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere,” New Media & Society, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 9–27, 2002.

    [5] N. Baym, Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2010.

    [6] C. Shirky, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Press, 2008.

    [7] K. N. Hampton and B. Wellman, “Neighboring in Netville: How the internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb,” City & Community, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 277–311, 2003.

    [8] J. Preece and D. Maloney-Krichmar, “Online communities: Design, theory, and practice,” J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun., vol. 10, no. 4, 2005.

    [9] E. Pariser, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Press, 2011.

    [10] C. Sunstein, #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 2017.

    [11] S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, 2018.

    [12] K. Starbird, “Disinformation’s spread: Bots, trolls and all of us,” Nature, vol. 571, pp. 449, 2019.

    [13] A. Joinson, “Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity,” European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 177–192, 2001.

    [14] J. Suler, “The online disinhibition effect,” CyberPsychology & Behavior, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 321–326, 2004.

    [15] M. Cinelli et al., “The echo chamber effect on social media,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 118, no. 9, 2021.

  • Downloads