Human Values in the Age of Autonomous Technologies

  • Authors

    • Dr. Shalini Gupta Associate Professor, Panjab University, India. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PII6A4N

    Published 07-05-2022

  • Autonomous Systems, Human Values, Artificial Intelligence Ethics, Value-Sensitive Design, Explainable AI, Algorithmic Fairness, Ethical AI, Socio-Technical Systems

    Issue

    Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    S. Gupta, “Human Values in the Age of Autonomous Technologies”, IJIRHT, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 01–14, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2022PII6A4N.

  • Abstract

    The rapid development of autonomous technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and robotics has transformed the relationship between humans and machines. While these systems enhance efficiency and productivity, they raise critical concerns about preserving human values in automated decision-making. Key values such as fairness, accountability, transparency, privacy, and dignity are often overlooked, as autonomous systems rely heavily on data-driven algorithms that may embed biases. This misalignment can lead to discrimination, reduced trust, and unintended consequences in sensitive sectors like healthcare, transportation, and criminal justice. Addressing this issue requires integrating human values into system design through an interdisciplinary approach combining computer science, ethics, sociology, and policy studies. The paper highlights challenges such as value ambiguity, contextual differences, and technical limitations in encoding ethics. It proposes a mixed-method approach involving stakeholder analysis, value elicitation, algorithm auditing, and ethical performance evaluation. Findings suggest that systems incorporating multi-stakeholder input and adaptive ethical constraints align better with human values than purely data-driven models. The study emphasizes the importance of regulatory frameworks, transparency, explainable AI, and continuous monitoring to ensure ethical deployment. Ultimately, embedding human values in autonomous systems is a socio-ethical necessity, requiring scalable, context-aware, and culturally sensitive solutions to achieve sustainable technological development.

  • References

    [1] Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

    [2] Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399.

    [3] Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 36(4), 105–114.

    [4] Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., et al. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2).

    [5] Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., & Borning, A. (2006). Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems.

    [6] Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. (2019). Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with Moral Imagination. MIT Press.

    [7] Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671–732.

    [8] Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., et al. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6).

    [9] Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., et al. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. FAT* Conference.

    [10] Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608.

    [11] Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier. KDD Conference.

    [12] Samek, W., Wiegand, T., & Müller, K. R. (2017). Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models. ITU Journal.

    [13] European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Official Journal of the European Union.

    [14] OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. OECD Publishing.

    [15] Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., et al. (2016). Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565.

  • Downloads