The Impact of Digital Platforms on Civic Engagement and Democracy

  • Authors

    • Michael Rabin Professor, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel. Author
    • Amir Pnueli Professor, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2024PI2T5B

    Published 02-04-2024

  • Digital Democracy, Civic Engagement, Social Media, E-Governance, Political Participation, Digital Platforms, Democratic Governance, Civic Technology, Public Participation, Information Society

    Issue

    Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    M. Rabin and A. Pnueli, “The Impact of Digital Platforms on Civic Engagement and Democracy”, IJIRHT, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 01–16, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.67228/3071561X/IJIRHT-2024PI2T5B.

  • Abstract

    Digital platforms have transformed democratic participation by enabling citizens to engage with governments, political institutions, and communities through social media, online forums, e-governance portals, and digital collaboration tools. These technologies enhance political awareness, information access, real-time communication, civic engagement, and large-scale social mobilization. However, they also introduce challenges such as misinformation, algorithmic bias, political polarization, privacy concerns, and unequal access to digital resources. This study examines the impact of digital platforms on civic participation, public discourse, policy engagement, and institutional trust using a mixed-method conceptual approach. The findings indicate that digital technologies significantly improve citizen engagement, government transparency, responsiveness, and opportunities for collective action. At the same time, concerns remain regarding information integrity, democratic polarization, and algorithm-driven influence. To address these challenges, the study proposes a Digital Civic Engagement Framework (DCEF) that integrates technological innovation, democratic governance, digital literacy, and regulatory mechanisms. The framework emphasizes responsible platform governance, algorithmic transparency, citizen empowerment, and collaborative policymaking. The research provides practical insights for policymakers, technology providers, democratic institutions, and civil society organizations seeking to strengthen democratic values and civic participation in the digital age.

  • References

    [1] Y. Benkler, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 2006.

    [2] M. Castells, Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, 2015.

    [3] S. Coleman and J. G. Blumler, The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    [4] H. Gil de Zúñiga, N. Jung, and S. Valenzuela, “Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 319–336, 2012.

    [5] W. H. Dutton, “The fifth estate emerging through the network of networks,” Prometheus, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2009.

    [6] A. Chadwick, The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2017.

    [7] C. Shirky, Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Press, 2008.

    [8] E. Pariser, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York, NY, USA: Penguin Books, 2011.

    [9] C. Sunstein, #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2017.

    [10] Z. Tufekci, Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 2017.

    [11] S. Boulianne, “Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 524–538, 2015.

    [12] S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, 2018.

    [13] J. Van Dijck, T. Poell, and M. De Waal, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2018.

    [14] P. M. Napoli, Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press, 2019.

    [15] S. J. Ward and H. Derakhshan, Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing, 2017.

    [16] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820

  • Downloads