A Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Machine Learning Models for Low-Latency Enterprise Data Processing

  • Authors

    • Raja Ganesan Independent Researcher, India. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3142788X/IJMLPA-V9I2P101

    Published 04-03-2026

  • Adaptive Machine Learning, Enterprise Data Processing, Low-Latency Computing, Online Learning, Concept Drift, Incremental Learning, Adaptive Decision Trees, Ensemble Learning, Real-Time Analytics, Model Evaluation

    Issue

    Section

    Articles
  • Abstract

    With the rising requirements for enterprise data processing, intelligent models are becoming a must-have to be able to deliver accurate predictions under tight latency, throughput and resource requirements. Yet traditional machine learning systems tend to be based on set model architectures that can become suboptimal under varying data distributions, workloads, and computational resources. The authors introduce a framework for comparing adaptive machine learning models with low-latency enterprise data processing capabilities. The framework takes into account incremental learning, adaptive decision trees, online ensemble learning, lightweight neural networks and prediction latency, throughput, adaptability, computational overhead and predictive accuracy. A common experimental approach is established to test these models under variable data arrival rates, concept drift and heterogeneous processing requirements. The metrics used to assess performance include latency percentiles, throughput, classification accuracy, adaptation delay and normalized resource utilization. Analytical formulations are introduced to help with the multi-dimensional comparison and selection of models for deployment. However, as empirical measurements are not given, the numerical comparison is not meant to be an experimental confirmation but rather an illustration. The framework generated as a result allows for a reproducible model for selecting adaptive learning for enterprise applications with latency sensitivity.

  • References

    [1] J. Gama, I. Žliobaitė, A. Bifet, M. Pechenizkiy, and A. Bouchachia, “A survey on concept drift adaptation,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, Art. no. 44, pp. 1–37, Mar. 2014.

    [2] P. Domingos and G. Hulten, “Mining high-speed data streams,” in Proceedings of the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Boston, MA, USA, 2000, pp. 71–80.

    [3] A. Bifet and R. Gavaldà, “Adaptive learning from evolving data streams,” in Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis VIII, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5772. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2009, pp. 249–260.

    [4] Paruchuri, J. K. (2022). Survey of cloud-native workflow orchestration with Apache Airflow. International Journal of Computer Techniques (IJCT), 9(3), 1-15.

    [5] A. Bifet, G. Holmes, R. Kirkby, and B. Pfahringer, “MOA: Massive online analysis,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 11, pp. 1601–1604, 2010.

    [6] Brahmandam, L. M. K. (2024). Performance Engineering for Multi-Tenant Analytic Workloads on Snowflake: An Empirical Study of Clustering, Materialized Views, Query Tuning, and Virtual Warehouse Sizing Across Production Reference Deployments at Billion-Row Scale. International Journal of AI, BigData, Computational and Management Studies, 5(1), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9416.IJAIBDCMS-V5I1P120

    [7] J. Gama, R. Sebastião, and P. P. Rodrigues, “Issues in evaluation of stream learning algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France, 2009, pp. 329–338.

    [8] A. Bifet and R. Gavaldà, “Learning from time-changing data with adaptive windowing,” in Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2007, pp. 443–448.

    [9] Arora, A. S., Yachamaneni, T., & Kotadiya, U. (2024). Architectural Optimization of Serverless Big Data Pipelines for AI Workloads Using Cloud Functions and Managed Spark on GCP. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 5(1), 61-68.

    [10] A. Bifet, G. Holmes, B. Pfahringer, R. Kirkby, and R. Gavaldà, “New ensemble methods for evolving data streams,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France, 2009, pp. 139–148.

    [11] Seknametla, P. R., & Sunkara, R. (2023). GitOps at Scale: Multi-Cluster Kubernetes Management Using Declarative Infrastructure Pipelines.

    [12] H. M. Gomes, A. Bifet, J. Read, J. P. Barddal, F. Enembreck, B. Pfahringer, G. Holmes, and T. Abdessalem, “Adaptive random forests for evolving data stream classification,” Machine Learning, vol. 106, pp. 1469–1495, 2017.

    [13] A. Bifet, J. Read, I. Žliobaitė, B. Pfahringer, and G. Holmes, “Pitfalls in benchmarking data stream classification and how to avoid them,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, 2013.

    [14] J. Z. Kolter and M. A. Maloof, “Dynamic weighted majority: An ensemble method for drifting concepts,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 8, pp. 2755–2790, 2007.

    [15] Paruchuri, J. K. (2021). Lakehouse architecture: Unifying data lakes and data warehouses. International Journal of Computer Techniques (IJCT), 8(1), 1-15.

    [16] M. Baena-García, J. del Campo-Ávila, R. Fidalgo, A. Bifet, R. Gavalda, and R. Morales-Bueno, “Early drift detection method,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams, 2006, pp. 77–86.

    [17] I. Žliobaitė, “Learning under concept drift: An overview,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.4784, 2010.

    [18] A. Bifet, G. Holmes, and B. Pfahringer, “Leveraging bagging for evolving data streams,” in Proceedings of the European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Barcelona, Spain, 2010, pp. 135–150.

    [19] Konatham, M. R., Uddandarao, D. P., Vadlamani, R. K., & Nair, R. (2025, September). Optimizing Credit Risk Assessment in Digital Banking Through AI-Driven Predictive Science. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Computing Technologies (ICACT) (pp. 478-483). IEEE.

    [20] J. Montiel, J. Read, A. Bifet, and T. Abdessalem, “Scikit-multiflow: A multi-output streaming framework,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 19, no. 72, pp. 1–5, 2018.

  • Downloads