Machine Learning–Enhanced Identification Strategies for Causal Inference in Economics
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/3142788X/IJMLPA-2022PII4W6DPublished 09-03-2022
Causal Inference, Machine Learning, Econometrics, Instrumental Variables, Policy Evaluation, Heterogeneous Treatment Effects, High-Dimensional Data, Counterfactual Analysis Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]A. Krishnan, “Machine Learning–Enhanced Identification Strategies for Causal Inference in Economics”, IJMLPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 01–11, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.67228/3142788X/IJMLPA-2022PII4W6D.Abstract
Causal inference is central to economic analysis, enabling researchers to identify the effects of policy interventions, market shocks, and behavioral responses. Traditional econometric approaches, such as instrumental variables, difference-in-differences, and regression discontinuity designs, often rely on strong assumptions and linearity constraints. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) offer powerful tools to enhance identification strategies by capturing complex nonlinear relationships, high-dimensional interactions, and latent confounding factors. This paper proposes a framework that integrates machine learning techniques with classical econometric identification strategies to improve causal effect estimation. We demonstrate how ML methods—such as random forests, gradient boosting, and neural networks—can be used for flexible covariate adjustment, heterogeneity detection, and instrument selection. Through simulations and empirical applications in policy evaluation, labor economics, and macroeconomic interventions, the proposed approach shows improved precision, robustness, and interpretability. The results highlight the potential of ML-enhanced methods to advance causal inference in economics while maintaining theoretical rigor and policy relevance.
References
Economics, 11, 1–30.
[2] Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., et al. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1–C68.
[3] Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 87–106.
[4] Wager, S., & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113(523), 1228–1242.
[5] Varian, H. R. (2014). Big data: New tricks for econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 3–28.
[6] Hartford, J., Leyton-Brown, K., & Taddy, M. (2017). Deep IV: A flexible approach for counterfactual prediction. Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML).
[7] Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., & Wager, S. (2019). Generalized random forests. Annals of Statistics, 47(2), 1148–1178.
[8] Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2014). High-dimensional methods and inference on structural and treatment effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 29–50.
[9] Kunzel, S., Sekhon, J., Bickel, P., & Yu, B. (2019). Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 4156–4165.
[10] Atkeson, A., & Kehoe, P. (2005). Modeling and policy analysis in macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43(3), 973–1021.
[11] Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
[12] Hill, J. L. (2011). Bayesian nonparametric modeling for causal inference. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 20(1), 217–240.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]A. Krishnan, “Machine Learning–Enhanced Identification Strategies for Causal Inference in Economics”, IJMLPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 01–11, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.67228/3142788X/IJMLPA-2022PII4W6D.