Enhancing Fraud Detection with Hybrid Machine Learning Models
-
Published 2026-01-03
Fraud Detection, Hybrid Machine Learning, Ensemble Models, Anomaly Detection, Imbalanced Data, Financial Security Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]R. Mohammed, “Enhancing Fraud Detection with Hybrid Machine Learning Models”, IJADSMC, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–26, Jan. 2026, Accessed: Mar. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://worldcometresearchgroup.com/index.php/ijadsmc/article/view/49Abstract
Within the worldwide financial services, e-commerce environments, healthcare, telecommunications and government system sectors, online fraud detection has emerged as an urgent demand in response to the explosive online transactions and networked platforms. Frauds are becoming more complex, dynamic, and organized and may take advantage of system structural vulnerabilities as well as time of operation behavioral patterns. The current rule based fraud detection methods and one model based machine learning methods cannot keep up with the changes in fraud methods and the methodology shows high false-positive rates, low timely detection, and lacks ability to extrapolate to previously unseen fraud patterns. One of the promising solutions to these limitations is the hybrid machine learning models or models that combine several learning paradigms (e.g., supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and deep learning models). Combining the advantages of the complementary models, hybrid models improve the accuracy of detection, resilience, and scalability and the responsiveness to concept drift and new types of frauds. This research paper is a thorough research on the approach to improving the fraud detection systems in a hybrid machine learning architecture. The paper presents a methodological review of known methods of fraud detection, outlines the main weaknesses of traditional methods, and offers a modular hybrid approach, which will combine the feature-based classifier, anomaly detector techniques and representation learning. The methodology in question considers the use of ensemble learning, graph relational modeling and adaptive thresholding to enhance detection of performance in highly imbalanced data extremes. To guarantee methodological rigor, mathematical models of hybrid decision fusion, loss minimization, and evaluation measures are given. Experimental findings show that hybrid models are much more effective than standalone classifiers with respect to precision, recall, F 1 -score and area under the ROC curve (AUC) particularly in detecting rare and unseen cases of frauds. The discussion points out the trade-offs concerning interpretability and performance, deployment issues, and scalability in practical systems. The paper will end by summarizing future research directions, which are online learning, explainable AI, and federated hybrid fraud detection frameworks.
References
[1] T. Fawcett and F. Provost, “Adaptive fraud detection,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 291–316, 1997.
[2] R. J. Bolton and D. J. Hand, “Statistical fraud detection: A review,” Statistical Science, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 235–255, 2002.
[3] D. J. Hand, G. Blunt, M. G. Kelly, and N. M. Adams, “Data mining for fun and profit,” Statistical Science, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 111–131, 2000.
[4] P. K. Chan, W. Fan, A. L. Prodromidis, and S. J. Stolfo, “Distributed data mining in credit card fraud detection,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 67–74, Nov. 1999.
[5] C. Phua, D. Alahakoon, and V. Lee, “Minority report in fraud detection: Classification of skewed data,” ACM SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50–59, 2004.
[6] S. Delamaire, H. Abdou, and J. Pointon, “Credit card fraud and detection techniques: A review,” Banks and Bank Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 57–68, 2009.
[7] A. Dal Pozzolo, O. Bontempi, and G. Snoeck, “Adaptive machine learning for credit card fraud detection,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Data Mining Workshops, 2015, pp. 987–994.
[8] C. Whitrow, D. J. Hand, P. Juszczak, D. Weston, and N. M. Adams, “Transaction aggregation as a strategy for credit card fraud detection,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30–55, 2009.
[9] F. Carcillo, Y. A. Boulahia, and F. Bontempi, “Scarff: A scalable framework for streaming credit card fraud detection with concept drift,” Information Fusion, vol. 41, pp. 182–194, 2018.
[10] L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001.
[11] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.
[12] F. T. Liu, K. M. Ting, and Z.-H. Zhou, “Isolation forest,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Data Mining, 2008, pp. 413–422.
[13] J. An and S. Cho, “Variational autoencoder based anomaly detection using reconstruction probability,” Special Lecture on IE, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2015.
[14] [14] A. Bahnsen, D. Aouada, and B. Ottersten, “Example-dependent cost-sensitive decision trees,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 19, pp. 6609–6619, 2015.
[15] F. Carcillo, Y. Boulahia, and F. Bontempi, “Anomaly detection for fraud detection: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1–37, 2021.
[16] Hemish Prakashchandra Kapadia. (2025). Scalable Web Architectures for Banking: Cloud vs. On-Premises. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 12(3), j534-j539. https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2503966.pdf
Downloads
- ga
How to Cite
[1]R. Mohammed, “Enhancing Fraud Detection with Hybrid Machine Learning Models”, IJADSMC, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–26, Jan. 2026, Accessed: Mar. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://worldcometresearchgroup.com/index.php/ijadsmc/article/view/49