Technological Mediation of Human Relationships in the Digital Era

  • Authors

    • Dr. Katrina Keif Faculty of Information Technology, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30713315/IJAIDT-2024PI9X2V6

    Published 06-22-2026

  • Digital Communication, Technological Mediation, Human Relationships, Social Media, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Sociology, Human-Computer Interaction, Online Interaction, Virtual Communication, Digital Ethics

    Issue

    Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    K. Keif, “Technological Mediation of Human Relationships in the Digital Era”, IJAIDT, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.67228/30713315/IJAIDT-2024PI9X2V6.

  • Abstract

    Digital technologies have reshaped human relationships by transforming how people connect, communicate, and maintain social and professional bonds. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Zoom enable instant, global interaction, but also introduce challenges such as reduced authenticity, privacy concerns, digital loneliness, and algorithmic bias. This study analyzes the dual impact of digital mediation using an interdisciplinary approach, highlighting both its benefits (accessibility and connectivity) and drawbacks (emotional and social issues). It also examines the influence of AI and personalization on relationships. The findings suggest that digital technologies are neither entirely positive nor negative—their effects depend on user behavior and social context. The paper concludes that while these technologies enhance connectivity, they demand stronger digital ethics, emotional awareness, and relational skills.

  • References

    [1] McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.

    [2] Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley-Blackwell.

    [3] Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.

    [4] Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.

    [5] Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.

    [6] Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.

    [7] Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.

    [8] Kross, E., et al. (2013). Facebook use and subjective well-being. PLOS ONE, 8(8), e69841.

    [9] Verduyn, P., et al. (2015). Passive Facebook use and well-being. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 144(2), 480–492.

    [10] Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.

    [11] Hancock, J. T., et al. (2007). Computer-mediated communication and emotional expression. Human Communication Research, 33(2), 136–153.

    [12] boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.

    [13] Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin.

    [14] Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In Media Technologies. MIT Press.

    [15] Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.

    [16] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820

  • Downloads