AI-Based Knowledge Graphs for Intelligent Decision Support

  • Authors

    • Dr. Venkatesh Iyer Professor, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India. Author
    • Dr. Nandhini Ravi Assistant Professor, VIT University, India. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30713315/IJAIDT-2024PII8E9S

    Published 08-05-2024

  • Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Graphs, Decision Support Systems, Semantic Web, Machine Learning, Ontology, Graph Embedding, Data Mining

    Issue

    Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    V. Iyer and N. Ravi, “AI-Based Knowledge Graphs for Intelligent Decision Support”, IJAIDT, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 01–13, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.67228/30713315/IJAIDT-2024PII8E9S.

  • Abstract

    The rapid growth of unstructured and heterogeneous data in modern information systems has created a need for intelligent methods to extract, organize, and utilize knowledge effectively. AI-based Knowledge Graphs (KGs) address this challenge by representing entities and their relationships in a semantically rich graph structure, enabling advanced reasoning and decision support. By integrating machine learning, natural language processing, and deep learning, KGs automate entity extraction, relationship identification, and knowledge inference, improving decision-making across domains such as healthcare, finance, e-commerce, and governance. This paper presents a framework combining data preprocessing, ontology development, graph embedding, and inference techniques. Experimental results show that AI-driven knowledge graphs significantly enhance decision accuracy, reduce ambiguity, and improve interpretability, achieving up to 85–92% higher decision efficiency compared to traditional methods. Future research focuses on scalability, explainability, and integration with emerging technologies like IoT and edge computing.

  • References

    [1] T. R. Gruber, “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–220, 1993.

    [2] J. F. Sowa, Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Pacific Grove, CA, USA: Brooks/Cole, 2000.

    [3] R. Davis, H. Shrobe, and P. Szolovits, “What is a knowledge representation?” AI Magazine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 17–33, 1993.

    [4] T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila, “The Semantic Web,” Scientific American, vol. 284, no. 5, pp. 34–43, 2001.

    [5] W3C, “Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax,” 2014.

    [6] W3C, “OWL Web Ontology Language Document Overview,” 2012.

    [7] A. Hogan et al., “Knowledge graphs,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1–37, 2021.

    [8] S. Auer et al., “DBpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data,” in Proc. ISWC, 2007, pp. 722–735.

    [9] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2016.

    [10] P. Domingos, “A few useful things to know about machine learning,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 78–87, 2012.

    [11] A. Bordes, N. Usunier, A. Garcia-Duran, J. Weston, and O. Yakhnenko, “Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data,” in Proc. NIPS, 2013, pp. 2787–2795. (TransE)

    [12] A. Grover and J. Leskovec, “Node2Vec: Scalable feature learning for networks,” in Proc. KDD, 2016, pp. 855–864.

    [13] T. N. Kipf and M. Welling, “Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks,” in Proc. ICLR, 2017.

    [14] X. Dong, E. Gabrilovich, G. Heitz, W. Horn, K. Murphy, S. Sun, and W. Zhang, “Knowledge Vault: A web-scale approach to probabilistic knowledge fusion,” in Proc. KDD, 2014.

    [15] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820

  • Downloads