AI-Driven Business Resilience Frameworks for Digital Economies
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30713315/IJAIDT-2025PI7W9FPublished 06-05-2025
Artificial Intelligence, Business Resilience, Digital Economy, Machine Learning, Risk Management, Predictive Analytics, Digital Transformation, Adaptive Systems, Enterprise Resilience, Intelligent Decision Support Issue
Section
ArticlesAbstract
Digital economies face increasing risks from cyber threats, operational disruptions, and market uncertainties. Traditional resilience approaches are often reactive and insufficient for dynamic environments. This paper proposes an AI-Driven Business Resilience Framework (AIBRF) that integrates data acquisition, AI analytics, risk prediction, adaptive decision-making, resilience orchestration, and continuous learning. By leveraging machine learning, predictive analytics, and intelligent automation, the framework enables proactive risk management and real-time adaptation. Experimental results demonstrate improvements in risk detection, recovery time, decision-making efficiency, resource utilization, and business continuity. The proposed framework provides a scalable and intelligent approach for enhancing organizational resilience in digital economies, while future enhancements may incorporate generative AI, federated learning, explainable AI, and blockchain technologies.
References
[1] S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2021.
[2] T. H. Davenport and R. Ronanki, “Artificial Intelligence for the Real World,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 108–116, 2018.
[3] E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York, NY, USA: W.W. Norton & Company, 2014.
[4] Gajula, S. (2024). Cybersecurity risk prediction using graph neural networks. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.
[5] D. Kahneman, O. Sibony, and C. R. Sunstein, Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. New York, NY, USA: Little, Brown Spark, 2021.
[6] M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier,” in Proc. ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016, pp. 1135–1144.
[7] A. Esteva et al., “A Guide to Deep Learning in Healthcare,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2019.
[8] T. M. Mitchell, Machine Learning. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
[9] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep Learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015.
[10] Gajula, S. (2024). Adaptive zero trust architecture for securing financial microservices. Computer Fraud & Security, 2024(12), 643–655.
[11] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2016.
[12] T. H. Davenport and R. Bean, “Big Data and AI Executive Survey 2023,” MIT Sloan Management Review, pp. 1–18, 2023.
[13] J. Pearl, The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. New York, NY, USA: Basic Books, 2018.
[14] M. Janssen, H. van der Voort, and A. Wahyudi, “Factors Influencing Big Data Decision-Making Quality,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 70, pp. 338–345, 2017.
[15] K. Schwab, The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2016.
[16] B. Marr, Artificial Intelligence in Practice: How 50 Successful Companies Used AI and Machine Learning to Solve Problems. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2019.
[17] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820
[18] A. Rai, “Explainable AI: From Black Box to Glass Box,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 137–141, 2020.
Downloads