Self-Healing Data Pipeline Architecture Using Predictive Failure Detection and Adaptive Machine Learning
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-V9I3P104Published 09-25-2026
Self-Healing Data Pipelines, Predictive Failure Detection, Adaptive Machine Learning, Data Engineering, Anomaly Detection, Automated Recovery, Data Quality, Pipeline Observability Issue
Section
ArticlesAbstract
Modern enterprises depend on reliable data pipelines for business intelligence, predictive analytics, artificial intelligence, and decision-making. However, distributed data platforms face challenges such as pipeline failures, data quality issues, schema changes, processing delays, and infrastructure instability. Traditional monitoring systems rely on reactive alerts and manual intervention. This paper proposes a conceptual self-healing data pipeline architecture integrating predictive failure detection, anomaly detection, automated recovery, continuous data quality assessment, root-cause analysis, and feedback-driven optimization. A literature-based methodology is used to evaluate the proposed framework conceptually against reactive monitoring, rule-based recovery, and predictive monitoring. Key evaluation metrics include recovery time, failure detection, data integrity, false alarms, processing latency, and operational overhead. As the architecture has not been experimentally implemented or tested, no empirical performance claims are made. The study also identifies challenges involving concept drift, recovery safety, model uncertainty, dependency management, and governance. The proposed framework provides a foundation for future research and practical implementation in enterprise data engineering, cloud analytics, and machine learning operations.
References
[1] Breck, E., Polyzotis, N., Roy, S., Whang, S. E., & Zinkevich, M. (2019). Data validation for machine learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems, 1, 334–347. https://proceedings.mlsys.org/
[2] Virendra Jangid. (2024). Cloud-Native Financial Data Platforms for Risk and Compliance Management. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering, 12(23s), 4389 –. Retrieved from https://ijisae.org/index.php/IJISAE/article/view/8349
[3] Arora, A. S., Yachamaneni, T., & Kotadiya, U. (2024). Architectural Optimization of Serverless Big Data Pipelines for AI Workloads Using Cloud Functions and Managed Spark on GCP. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 5(1), 61-68.
[4] Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541882
[5] Hosahalli Seenappa, V. K. (2025). Next-generation intelligent multi-cloud enterprise networking: Integrating secure architecture, AI-optimized traffic engineering, and LLM-driven autonomous network operations. International Journal of Leading Research Publication (IJLRP), 6(12), 1–11.
[6] Sandra, K. (2022). Trino as a Unified Query Layer for Heterogeneous Data Sources: Survey and Benchmarks.
[7] Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014). A survey on concept drift adaptation. ACM Computing Surveys, 46(4), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1145/2523813
[8] Visweswaran, K. (2026, March). Low-Latency AI Models for Predictive Connection Management in Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) Communication Systems. In 2026 6th International Conference on Expert Clouds and Applications (ICOECA) (pp. 541-548). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOECA68095.2026.11485045
[9] Kleppmann, M. (2017). Designing data-intensive applications: The big ideas behind reliable, scalable, and maintainable systems. O’Reilly Media.
[10] Paruchuri, J. K. (2024). Apache Kyuubi on Kubernetes: Building Elastic Multi-Tenant Spark SQL Platforms. INDO-CONTINENTAL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS.
[11] Uddandarao, D. P., Mahajan, A., & Krishnamsetty, P. Double Machine Learning for Downstream Causal Measurement: A Hybrid Econometric-ML Framework for Feature Valuation.
[12] Sculley, D., Holt, G., Golovin, D., Davydov, E., Phillips, T., Ebner, D., Chaudhary, V., Young, M., Crespo, J.-F., & Dennison, D. (2015). Hidden technical debt in machine learning systems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 28. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/hash/86df7dcfd896fcaf2674f757a2463eba-Abstract.html
[13] Dean, J., & Ghemawat, S. (2008). MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 51(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/1327452.1327492
[14] Gantikota, S. (2026). Securing Microservice Communication across WCF, JAX-RS, and Spring Boot: Authentication, Authorization, and Audit Patterns for Healthcare Interoperability. American International Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 8(2), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.63282/3117-5481/AIJCST-V8I2P102
[15] Akidau, T., Bradshaw, R., Chambers, C., Chernyak, S., Fernández-Moctezuma, R. J., Lax, R., McVeety, S., Mills, D., Perry, F., Schmidt, E., & Whittle, S. (2015). The dataflow model: A practical approach to balancing correctness, latency, and cost in massive-scale, unbounded, out-of-order data processing. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 8(12), 1792–1803. https://doi.org/10.14778/2824032.2824076
[16] Sato, D., Wider, A., & Windheuser, C. (2019). Continuous delivery for machine learning. Martin Fowler. https://martinfowler.com/articles/cd4ml.html
[17] Kreps, J., Narkhede, N., & Rao, J. (2011). Kafka: A distributed messaging system for log processing. In Proceedings of the NetDB Workshop. https://notes.stephenholiday.com/Kafka.pdf
[18] Sunkara, R. (2024). Scalable Pixel-Level Visual Regression Detection via On-Device MD5 Hashing of GPU Frame Buffers. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 5(3), 201-204. https://doi.org/10.63282/3050-9246.IJETCSIT-V5I3P120
Downloads
Similar Articles
- Trang Huynh, Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Industrial Resource Allocation in Semiconductor Manufacturing: Joint Optimization of Production Throughput, Resource Utilization, Operational Costs, and Profitability , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026)
- Shakila Begum, Multi-Objective Predictive Optimization for Latency-Aware and Energy-Efficient Intelligent Computing , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
- N. Seshagiri, H. N. Mahabala, Hybrid Deep Learning Frameworks for Robotic Object Recognition , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
- Ghatoth Mishra, Ensuring Patient Safety and Managing Risks in AI-Enabled Healthcare Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
- Dr. Venkatesh Iyer, Dr. Nandhini Ravi, Development of Smart Robotic Grippers Using Tactile Sensors , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
- Narendra Karmarkar, Generative AI-Assisted Robot Task Planning in Industrial Applications , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
- Zdzisław Pawlak, Jan Łukasiewicz, Intelligent Embedded Vision Systems for Autonomous Machines , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
- Ole-Johan Dahl, Kristen Nygaard, Vision-Guided Robotic Assembly Using Deep Neural Networks , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
- Mr. Chen Ming, Ms. Wang Li, Edge-AI-Based Decision Systems for Autonomous Ground Robots , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- Dr. Chen Wei, Dr. Liu Fang, Real-Time Path Correction for Assembly Line Robots Using Sensor Fusion , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.