Autonomous Robot Localization Using Advanced Sensor Fusion Techniques

  • Authors

    • Dr. Carlos Mendes Department of Biotechnology, Southern Brazil University, Porto Alegre, Brazil Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2020PI5X1P

    Published 02-03-2020

  • Autonomous Robots, Sensor Fusion, Robot Localization, Extended Kalman Filter, Particle Filter, Lidar, IMU, Odometry, State Estimation, Probabilistic Robotics

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    C. Mendes, “Autonomous Robot Localization Using Advanced Sensor Fusion Techniques”, IJIARE, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2020PI5X1P.
  • Abstract

    Autonomous robot localization is a critical function that enables intelligent navigation, motion planning, and interaction within structured and unstructured environments. Before 2019, significant advancements were made by integrating multiple sensors such as wheel encoders, IMUs, LiDAR, cameras, ultrasonic sensors, and GNSS. Since each sensor has limitations like drift, uncertainty, and environmental sensitivity, advanced sensor fusion techniques were developed to improve localization accuracy and reliability. This study examines localization methods based on probabilistic filtering approaches including Kalman Filter, Extended Kalman Filter (EKF), Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF), Particle Filter (PF), and graph-based optimization. A multi-layer sensor fusion architecture combining odometry, inertial sensing, LiDAR, and vision-based observations is proposed for accurate robot pose estimation in dynamic environments. Experimental results demonstrate that multi-sensor fusion significantly improves localization accuracy, reduces drift, enhances robustness against sensor failures, and increases adaptability in indoor environments. Metrics such as RMSE, trajectory consistency, heading accuracy, covariance stability, and computational efficiency were used for evaluation. The integration of LiDAR, IMU, and wheel odometry reduced localization error by over 90% compared to wheel odometry alone, while vision-based loop closure further improved map consistency. Overall, the study highlights that advanced sensor fusion techniques provide an effective and reliable solution for autonomous robot localization and continue to influence modern robotic navigation systems.

  • References

    [1] S. Thrun, W. Burgard, and D. Fox, Probabilistic Robotics. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2005.

    [2] R. E. Kalman, “A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems,” Transactions of the ASME–Journal of Basic Engineering, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 1960.

    [3] Y. Bar-Shalom, X. R. Li, and T. Kirubarajan, Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. New York, USA: Wiley, 2001.

    [4] H. Durrant-Whyte and T. Bailey, “Simultaneous localization and mapping: Part I,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2006.

    [5] T. Bailey and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Part II,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 108–117, 2006.

    [6] D. Fox, W. Burgard, F. Dellaert, and S. Thrun, “Monte Carlo localization: Efficient position estimation for mobile robots,” Proceedings of AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 343–349, 1999.

    [7] F. Dellaert, D. Fox, W. Burgard, and S. Thrun, “Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots,” Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1322–1328, 1999.

    [8] J. Leonard and H. Durrant-Whyte, “Mobile robot localization by tracking geometric beacons,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 376–382, 1991.

    [9] T. T. Hoang, P. M. Duong, N. T. Van, D. A. Viet, and T. Q. Vinh, “Multi-sensor perceptual system for mobile robot and sensor fusion-based localization,” 2016.

    [10] T. Emter and J. Petereit, “Stochastic cloning and smoothing for fusion of multiple relative and absolute measurements for localization and mapping,” Proceedings of IEEE ICARCV, 2018.

    [11] P. Geneva, K. Eckenhoff, Y. Yang, and G. Huang, “LIPS: LiDAR-Inertial 3D Plane SLAM,” Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ IROS, 2018.

    [12] C. Chang, H. Zhu, M. Li, and S. You, “A review of visual-inertial simultaneous localization and mapping,” Robotics, vol. 7, no. 3, 2018.

    [13] P. Henkel et al., “Precise positioning of robots with fusion of GNSS, INS, odometry, barometer, local positioning system and visual localization,” ION GNSS+ Conference, 2018.

    [14] H. Ye, Y. Chen, and M. Liu, “Tightly coupled 3D LiDAR inertial odometry and mapping,” 2019.

    [15] M. Zaffar, S. Ehsan, R. Stolkin, and K. M. Maier, “Sensors, SLAM and long-term autonomy: A review,” 2018.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

1-10 of 81

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.