LLM-Enhanced Accessibility Optimization for Digital Experience Platforms

  • Authors

    • Siva Sai Krishna Suryadevara Salesforce Developer at Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/ICIoTCAA-2026P113

    Published 08-31-2026

  • Digital Experience Platforms, Accessibility Optimization, WCAG, Large Language Models, AI-driven UX, Adaptive Interfaces, Assistive Technologies, Automated Compliance, Inclusive Design
  • Abstract

    Digital experience platforms (DXPs) aim to offer smooth, personalized interactions, but a lot of them are still unable to provide the right kind of inclusive experiences due to persistent accessibility problems such as unstandardized semantic structure, content lacking descriptions, and compliance workflows that are fragmented. Some of the issues can be identified with the help of conventional rule-based scanners and manual reviews, but these methods miss contextual nuances, take a lot of human time and effort, and are incapable of scaling at the same rate as new digital content is generated. The difference has repositioned Large Language Models (LLMs) as a new generation of accessibility optimizers who can grasp the intent, figure out complicated layouts, and come up with practical human-centered remediation suggestions that can be implemented. The paper presents an LLM-facilitated method of addressing accessibility problems in DXPs via automated content understanding, adaptive accessibility checks, and guided recommendations that change depending on platform behavior. The method uses LLM-powered analysis alongside the current DXP pipelines to allow for the on-demand examination of text, metadata, navigation flows, and interactive components. The example traces how the tool was employed on a high-traffic enterprise portal to make it serve as proof of concept. Measurable improvements were reported in the clarity of the content, alt-text accuracy, the coherence of the heading structure, color-contrast compliance, and the overall user experience especially for users who rely on assistive technologies. The results show that the addition of LLMs to the workflow not only cuts the time needed for manual reviews but also enhances the rate at which issues are detected beyond what is achievable with conventional tooling and that more consistency can be obtained across content teams that are distributed.

  • References

    [1] Ramasundaram, Aishwarya, et al. "Fluidity and the customer experience in digital platform ecosystems." International Journal of Information Management 69 (2023): 102599.

    [2] Zhang, Hongmei, et al. "Experience value cocreation on destination online platforms." Journal of Travel Research 57.8 (2018): 1093-1107.

    [3] Nicholson, Brian, Petter Nielsen, and Johan Saebo. "Digital platforms for development." Information Systems Journal 31.6 (2021).

    [4] De Reuver, Mark, Carsten Sørensen, and Rahul C. Basole. "The digital platform: a research agenda." Journal of information technology 33.2 (2018): 124-135.

    [5] Bolton, Ruth N., et al. "Customer experience challenges: bringing together digital, physical and social realms." Journal of service management 29.5 (2018): 776-808.

    [6] Hein, Andreas, et al. "Digital platform ecosystems." Electronic markets 30.1 (2020): 87-98.

    [7] Qiu, Junping, et al. "User experience of digital science and education evaluation platform: identification and analysis of key influencing factors." Library Hi Tech 42.6 (2024): 1839-1862.

    [8] Peters, Dorian, Rafael A. Calvo, and Richard M. Ryan. "Designing for motivation, engagement and wellbeing in digital experience." Frontiers in psychology 9 (2018): 300159.

    [9] Sebastian, Ina M., et al. "How big old companies navigate digital transformation." Strategic information management. Routledge, 2020. 133-150.

    [10] Graham, Mark, Isis Hjorth, and Vili Lehdonvirta. "Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods." Transfer: European review of labour and research 23.2 (2017): 135-162.

    [11] Amin, Fakhrurrazi M., and Hanna Sundari. "Efl students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, lms, or messenger application?." Studies in English Language and Education 7.2 (2020): 362-378.

    [12] Levy, Shalom. "Brand bank attachment to loyalty in digital banking services: mediated by psychological engagement with service platforms and moderated by platform types." International Journal of Bank Marketing 40.4 (2022): 679-700.

    [13] Sutherland, Will, and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda." International Journal of Information Management 43 (2018): 328-341.

    [14] Coleman, E. Gabriella. "Ethnographic approaches to digital media." Annual review of anthropology 39.1 (2010): 487-505.

    [15] Ciulli, Francesca, Ans Kolk, and Siri Boe-Lillegraven. "Circularity brokers: Digital platform organizations and waste recovery in food supply chains." Journal of Business Ethics (2020): 299-331.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

11-20 of 116

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.