Advanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2018PI7K2MPublished 01-02-2018
Human Activity Recognition, Wearable Sensors, Machine Learning, Sensor Fusion, Feature Extraction, Time-Series Analysis, Ensemble Learning Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]S. Diallo and F. Z. El Idrissi, “Advanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors”, ijmiet, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2018PI7K2M.Abstract
Wearable sensor-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has emerged as a key area in pervasive computing, healthcare monitoring, and smart environments. With the advancement of low-cost, energy-efficient sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, continuous human motion tracking has become more feasible. Traditional HAR systems relied on manual feature extraction and classical machine learning models like SVM, Decision Trees, and k-NN, but faced challenges such as noise, variability, and computational constraints. This study reviews pre-2018 developments and proposes an improved HAR framework incorporating advanced feature engineering, sensor fusion, and ensemble learning techniques. The system follows key stages including data acquisition, preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. By combining multi-sensor data and hybrid models, the framework enhances classification accuracy and robustness. Evaluation using benchmark datasets like UCI HAR and WISDM demonstrates improved performance over conventional methods. The paper also highlights key challenges such as energy efficiency, scalability, real-time processing, and privacy, while emphasizing the future role of deep learning and adaptive systems for personalized activity recognition. Overall, wearable sensor-based HAR shows strong potential in healthcare, fitness, and smart environments.
References
[1] Bao, L., & Intille, S. S. (2004). Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing.
[2] Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011). Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter.
[3] Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X., & Reyes-Ortiz, J. L. (2013). A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones. ESANN.
[4] Banos, O., et al. (2014). Window size impact in human activity recognition. Sensors Journal.
[5] Bulling, A., Blanke, U., & Schiele, B. (2014). A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys.
[6] Lara, O. D., & Labrador, M. A. (2013). A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
[7] Ravi, N., Dandekar, N., Mysore, P., & Littman, M. L. (2005). Activity recognition from accelerometer data. AAAI Conference.
[8] Khan, A. M., Lee, Y. K., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, T. S. (2010). Human activity recognition via an accelerometer-enabled smartphone using kernel discriminant analysis. Sensors.
[9] Preece, S. J., et al. (2009). Activity identification using body-mounted sensors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.
[10] Shoaib, M., Bosch, S., Incel, O. D., Scholten, H., & Havinga, P. J. (2014). Fusion of smartphone motion sensors for physical activity recognition. Sensors.
[11] Gjoreski, H., et al. (2015). How accurately can your wrist device recognize daily activities?. UbiComp.
[12] Hammerla, N. Y., Halloran, S., & Plötz, T. (2016). Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition. IJCAI.
[13] Ordóñez, F. J., & Roggen, D. (2016). Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors.
[14] Ronao, C. A., & Cho, S. B. (2016). Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]S. Diallo and F. Z. El Idrissi, “Advanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors”, ijmiet, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2018PI7K2M.
Similar Articles
- Dr. Arvind Kumar Singh, The Influence of Green Technology Adoption on Manufacturing Efficiency , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- H. N. Mahabala, Ajay, Green AI: Energy-Efficient Machine Learning Models for Sustainable Computing , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
- N. Seshagiri, Federated Learning Frameworks for Privacy-Preserving Smart Applications , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
- Joseph Robin, Tamilarasan, AI-Assisted Drug Discovery: Emerging Technologies and Challenges , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
- Dr. Priya Natarajan, Edge Computing Architectures for Ultra-Low Latency Applications , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, Quantum Computing Applications in Optimization and Data Analytics , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
- Kenji Sato, Aiko Yamamoto, AI-Powered Risk Assessment in Urban Construction Projects Using Predictive Analytics , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
- Dr. Hiroshi Tanaka, Dr. Yuki Nakamura, Assessing User Experience Trends in Next-Gen Mobile Applications , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
- Dr. Rakesh Chandra, The Future of Nano-Robotics in Medical Applications , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
- Louis Pouzin, Jacques Arsac, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Systems for Knowledge Management , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.