Advanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2018PI7K2MPublished 01-02-2018
Human Activity Recognition, Wearable Sensors, Machine Learning, Sensor Fusion, Feature Extraction, Time-Series Analysis, Ensemble Learning Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]S. Diallo and F. Z. El Idrissi, “Advanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors”, ijmiet, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2018PI7K2M.Abstract
Wearable sensor-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has emerged as a key area in pervasive computing, healthcare monitoring, and smart environments. With the advancement of low-cost, energy-efficient sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, continuous human motion tracking has become more feasible. Traditional HAR systems relied on manual feature extraction and classical machine learning models like SVM, Decision Trees, and k-NN, but faced challenges such as noise, variability, and computational constraints. This study reviews pre-2018 developments and proposes an improved HAR framework incorporating advanced feature engineering, sensor fusion, and ensemble learning techniques. The system follows key stages including data acquisition, preprocessing, segmentation, feature extraction, and classification. By combining multi-sensor data and hybrid models, the framework enhances classification accuracy and robustness. Evaluation using benchmark datasets like UCI HAR and WISDM demonstrates improved performance over conventional methods. The paper also highlights key challenges such as energy efficiency, scalability, real-time processing, and privacy, while emphasizing the future role of deep learning and adaptive systems for personalized activity recognition. Overall, wearable sensor-based HAR shows strong potential in healthcare, fitness, and smart environments.
References
[1] Bao, L., & Intille, S. S. (2004). Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing.
[2] Kwapisz, J. R., Weiss, G. M., & Moore, S. A. (2011). Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter.
[3] Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Oneto, L., Parra, X., & Reyes-Ortiz, J. L. (2013). A public domain dataset for human activity recognition using smartphones. ESANN.
[4] Banos, O., et al. (2014). Window size impact in human activity recognition. Sensors Journal.
[5] Bulling, A., Blanke, U., & Schiele, B. (2014). A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. ACM Computing Surveys.
[6] Lara, O. D., & Labrador, M. A. (2013). A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.
[7] Ravi, N., Dandekar, N., Mysore, P., & Littman, M. L. (2005). Activity recognition from accelerometer data. AAAI Conference.
[8] Khan, A. M., Lee, Y. K., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, T. S. (2010). Human activity recognition via an accelerometer-enabled smartphone using kernel discriminant analysis. Sensors.
[9] Preece, S. J., et al. (2009). Activity identification using body-mounted sensors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.
[10] Shoaib, M., Bosch, S., Incel, O. D., Scholten, H., & Havinga, P. J. (2014). Fusion of smartphone motion sensors for physical activity recognition. Sensors.
[11] Gjoreski, H., et al. (2015). How accurately can your wrist device recognize daily activities?. UbiComp.
[12] Hammerla, N. Y., Halloran, S., & Plötz, T. (2016). Deep, convolutional, and recurrent models for human activity recognition. IJCAI.
[13] Ordóñez, F. J., & Roggen, D. (2016). Deep convolutional and LSTM recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors.
[14] Ronao, C. A., & Cho, S. B. (2016). Human activity recognition with smartphone sensors using deep learning neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]S. Diallo and F. Z. El Idrissi, “Advanced Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors”, ijmiet, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2018PI7K2M.
Similar Articles
- Noah Wright, Isabella Moore, Hybrid Cloud Solutions for Modern Business Infrastructure , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
- Dr. Anita Verma, Impacts of Digital Journalism on Modern Communication , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
- Dr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Emerging Trends in Bio-Inspired Computing Models , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
- Dr. Hiroshi Tanaka, Dr. Yuki Nakamura, Trends in Cyber-Physical Security for Smart Factories , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- Jacques Arsac, Intelligent Transportation Systems Using Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communication , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
- Kanya Mohammed, Dr. Naree Thongchai, Cloud-Native Architectures for Scalable Enterprise Applications , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
- Peter Wilson, Olivia Martin, Digital Supply Chain Visibility Using Blockchain and Iot , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018)
- Dr. Geetha Ramasamy, Balancing Client Demands and Resource Constraints in High-Volume Client Interaction Environments , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
- Sarah Wilson, Daniel Moore, Client Engagement in Digital Transformation: Managing Resources for Seamless Transitions , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
- Karthik Raman, AI-Assisted Requirements Engineering Using Multimodal Language Models , International Journal of Modern Innovations and Emerging Trends: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.