Impacts of Digital Journalism on Modern Communication

  • Authors

    • Dr. Anita Verma Associate Professor, Banaras Hindu University, India. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2020PII7N9P

    Published 09-04-2020

  • Digital Journalism, Modern Communication, Online Media, Social Media, News Consumption, Information Technology

    Issue

    Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    A. Verma, “Impacts of Digital Journalism on Modern Communication”, ijmiet, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 01–15, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2020PII7N9P.

  • Abstract

    Digital journalism has essentially swept the scenery of the contemporary communication as it has transformed the manner in which information gets created, distributed, consumed, and perceived. The ability of the journalism industry to merge with digital technologies including the internet, mobile systems, social media, data analytics, artificial intelligence, and multimedia tools has both increased the speed of news dissemination and the performance of the job and role of a professional journalist. This paper discusses how digital journalism relates to the contemporary communication systems in terms of structural, technological, social, and ethical aspects. The paper discusses the impact of digital journalism concerning news credibility, speed, interactivity, personalization and global reach as well as challenges including misinformation, algorithm bias, downward revenue models and loss of traditional gatekeeping functions. A literature survey is carried out systematically to highlight the prevailing theories and research results in the recent studies. The research approach is a mixed approach of qualitative and quantitative in character, i.e. it uses content analysis, comparative measures, and conceptual modeling to analyze the result(s) of communication in the digital news ecosystem. Findings point to the fact that digital journalism increases the level of participatory communication and immediacy and poses serious threats associated with information overload, lack of trust, and accountability. The conclusion of the paper is that digital journalism enhances democratic communication and inclusiveness to the maximum, but regulatory frameworks, ethical standards, and technological literacy should be sustained to ensure that its beneficial effects on the society are fully realized. The results have a contribution on the communication studies and media research by providing an integrated analytical model that complies with the IEEE scholarly standards.

  • References

    [1] McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

    [2] McCombs, M. (2014). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

    [3] Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications (pp. 19–32). Sage.

    [4] Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.

    [5] Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.

    [6] Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: Considering the consequences of different types of news media online. New Media & Society, 5(2), 203–230.

    [7] Pavlik, J. V. (2001). Journalism and new media. Columbia University Press.

    [8] Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326–342.

    [9] Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

    [10] Hermida, A. (2011). Mechanisms of participation: How audience options shape the conversation. Journalism Practice, 5(2), 177–192.

    [11] Nielsen, R. K., & Graves, L. (2017). “News you don’t believe”: Audience perspectives on fake news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    [12] Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439.

    [13] Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.

    [14] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

    [15] Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Harvard University Press.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

31-40 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.