Edge Computing Architectures for Ultra-Low Latency Applications

  • Authors

    • Alan Bundy Professor of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2025PI2D6A

    Published 01-02-2025

  • Edge Computing, Ultra-Low Latency, Distributed Computing, 5g Networks, Resource Orchestration, Sdn, Nfv, Real-Time Systems, Iot, Cloud Computing

    Issue

    Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    A. Bundy, “Edge Computing Architectures for Ultra-Low Latency Applications”, ijmiet, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 01–15, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2025PI2D6A.

  • Abstract

    As enterprise data grows across cloud, edge, and geographically distributed environments, traditional Edge computing has emerged as a transformative extension of cloud computing by addressing the limitations of latency, bandwidth, and scalability in real-time applications. With the increasing demand for ultra-low latency in autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, telemedicine, smart cities, and augmented reality, traditional cloud architectures face challenges due to centralized processing and network delays. Edge computing overcomes these issues by processing data closer to end devices, enabling faster decision-making and reduced communication overhead. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of edge computing architectures for ultra-low latency applications, covering key technologies such as 5G, Software-Defined Networking (SDN), Network Function Virtualization (NFV), Artificial Intelligence (AI), microservices, and container orchestration. It also examines major challenges, including resource management, interoperability, security, and energy efficiency. A multi-layer edge computing framework with intelligent task scheduling and dynamic resource allocation is proposed to optimize latency and resource utilization. Experimental findings demonstrate significant improvements over conventional cloud architectures, achieving over 70% reduction in end-to-end latency and 65% improvement in resource efficiency. The study concludes that intelligent edge computing architectures will play a vital role in supporting future real-time applications and next-generation 6G-enabled digital ecosystems.

  • References

    [1] W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu, “Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, Oct. 2016.

    [2] M. Satyanarayanan, “The Emergence of Edge Computing,” Computer, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 30–39, Jan. 2017.

    [3] F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli, “Fog Computing and Its Role in the Internet of Things,” in Proceedings of MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, 2012, pp. 13–16.

    [4] European Telecommunications Standards Institute, “Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC); Framework and Reference Architecture,” ETSI White Paper, 2019.

    [5] Y. Mao, C. You, J. Zhang, K. Huang, and K. Letaief, “A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 2322–2358, 2017.

    [6] P. Mach and Z. Becvar, “Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey on Architecture and Computation Offloading,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1628–1656, 2017.

    [7] T. Taleb, K. Samdanis, and B. Mada, “On Multi-Access Edge Computing: A Survey of the Emerging 5G Network Edge Architecture,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1657–1681, 2017.

    [8] S. Yi, C. Li, and Q. Li, “A Survey of Fog Computing: Concepts, Applications and Issues,” in Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile Big Data, 2015, pp. 37–42.

    [9] R. Roman, J. Lopez, and M. Mambo, “Mobile Edge Computing, Fog and Cloudlet Security: A Survey,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 78, pp. 680–698, 2018.

    [10] N. Abbas, Y. Zhang, A. Taherkordi, and T. Skeie, “Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 450–465, 2018.

    [11] X. Sun and N. Ansari, “EdgeIoT: Mobile Edge Computing for the Internet of Things,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 22–29, Dec. 2016.

    [12] K. Dolui and S. Datta, “Comparison of Edge Computing Implementations: Fog Computing, Cloudlet and Mobile Edge Computing,” in Global Internet of Things Summit, 2017.

    [13] A. Yousefpour, G. Ishigaki, and J. P. Jue, “Fog Computing: Towards Minimizing Delay in the Internet of Things,” in IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing, 2017.

    [14] M. Chiang and T. Zhang, “Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 854–864, Dec. 2016.

    [15] S. Wang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Yang, “A Survey on Mobile Edge Networks: Convergence of Computing, Caching and Communications,” IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 6757–6779, 2017.

    [16] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820

    [17] Gajula, S. (2024). Adaptive zero trust architecture for securing financial microservices. Computer Fraud & Security, 2024(12), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.845

    [18] Gajula, S. (2024). Cybersecurity risk prediction using graph neural networks. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

71-80 of 81

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.