Modern Approaches to Low-Cost Housing through 3D Printing

  • Authors

    • Dr. Mohammed Asif Khan Professor, Jamia Millia Islamia, India Author
    • Dr. Shalini Gupta Associate Professor, Panjab University, India Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30716357/IJMRSE-2018PI9X5L

    Published 03-02-2018

  • 3D Printing in Construction, Affordable Housing, Additive Manufacturing, Sustainable Building Materials, Construction Automation, Digital Fabrication

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    Modern Approaches to Low-Cost Housing through 3D Printing. (2018). International Journal of Modern Research in Science & Engineering, 1(1), 01-14. https://doi.org/10.67228/30716357/IJMRSE-2018PI9X5L
  • Abstract

    Rapid urbanization, population growth, rising construction costs, and resource scarcity have made affordable housing a critical global challenge in the twenty-first century. Traditional construction methods, characterized by labor intensity, material inefficiencies, and environmental impact, are often inadequate to address large-scale housing shortages, particularly in developing and disaster-affected regions. In this context, 3D printing in construction, also known as additive manufacturing, has emerged as a disruptive technology with significant potential for low-cost housing. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of modern 3D printing approaches, focusing on technological foundations, material innovations, construction processes, and economic feasibility. It examines systems such as gantry-based, robotic arm-based, and mobile printer technologies, evaluating their suitability for affordable housing applications. Special attention is given to advanced materials, including printable cementitious mixtures, geopolymer concretes, recycled composites, and locally sourced materials, which help reduce costs and environmental impact. The study integrates digital design, structural optimization, material selection, and automated layer-by-layer construction into a unified housing delivery framework. Performance indicators such as construction time, material efficiency, structural integrity, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability are assessed. Findings indicate that 3D-printed housing can reduce construction costs by 30–60%, construction time by up to 70%, and material waste by over 50% compared to conventional methods. The paper also discusses socio-economic impacts, scalability challenges, regulatory constraints, and future research directions. Overall, it concludes that 3D printing technology offers a promising, sustainable, and transformative solution for delivering affordable and resilient housing worldwide.

  • References

    [1] B. Khoshnevis, “Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies,” Automation in Construction, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 5–19, 2004.

    [2] B. Khoshnevis, J. Hwang, K. T. Yao, and Z. Yeh, “Mega-scale fabrication by contour crafting,” International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 301–320, 2006.

    [3] S. Lim, R. Buswell, T. Le, S. Austin, A. Gibb, and T. Thorpe, “Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes,” Automation in Construction, vol. 21, pp. 262–268, 2012.

    [4] R. J. M. Wolfs, F. P. Bos, and T. A. M. Salet, “Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: Numerical modelling and experimental testing,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 106, pp. 103–116, 2018.

    [5] F. P. Bos, R. J. M. Wolfs, Z. Ahmed, and T. A. M. Salet, “Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: Potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing,” Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 209–225, 2016.

    [6] N. Labonnote, A. Rønnquist, B. Manum, and P. Rüther, “Additive construction: State-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities,” Automation in Construction, vol. 72, pp. 347–366, 2016.

    [7] S. Hager, W. Golonka, and R. Putanowicz, “3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction?” Procedia Engineering, vol. 151, pp. 292–299, 2016.

    [8] M. Perrot, D. Rangeard, and A. Pierre, “Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques,” Materials and Structures, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1213–1220, 2016.

    [9] T. Le, S. Austin, S. Lim, R. Buswell, A. Gibb, and T. Thorpe, “Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete,” Materials and Structures, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1221–1232, 2012.

    [10] A. Panda, M. J. Tan, and S. C. Paul, “Anisotropic mechanical performance of 3D printed fiber reinforced sustainable construction material,” Materials Letters, vol. 209, pp. 146–149, 2017.

    [11] M. G. Kazemian, X. Yuan, E. Cochran, and B. Khoshnevis, “Cementitious materials for construction-scale 3D printing: Laboratory testing of fresh printing mixture,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 145, pp. 639–647, 2017.

    [12] A. Buswell, S. Lim, R. Soar, A. Gibb, and T. Thorpe, “Freeform construction: Mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction,” Automation in Construction, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 138–147, 2010.

  • Downloads