Carbon Footprint Reduction Methods in the Construction Industry

  • Authors

    • Dr. Chen Wei Professor, Peking University, China Author
    • Dr. Liu Fang Associate Professor, Tsinghua University, China Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/3071-6357/IJMRSE-2019PI2B8M

    Published 02-03-2019

  • Carbon Footprint, Sustainable Construction, Green Buildings, Life Cycle Assessment, Renewable Energy, Low-Carbon Materials, Building Information Modeling

    Issue

    Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    Carbon Footprint Reduction Methods in the Construction Industry. (2019). International Journal of Modern Research in Science & Engineering, 2(1), 01-18. https://doi.org/10.67228/3071-6357/IJMRSE-2019PI2B8M

  • Abstract

    The construction sector is a major contributor to global carbon emissions due to its high energy consumption, extensive material use, and significant waste generation. Rapid urbanization and infrastructure development have further intensified these environmental impacts. Key emission sources include cement and steel production, transportation, construction activities, and building operations. This paper reviews various carbon reduction strategies in construction, including the use of sustainable materials, energy-efficient technologies, renewable energy integration, waste management practices, and digital tools. It adopts a life cycle approach to assess emissions across all project stages—from material extraction to end-of-life—using methods such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Building Information Modeling (BIM), and green certification systems. The study compares traditional and low-carbon construction methods through qualitative and quantitative analysis, finding that strategies like green materials, prefabrication, renewable energy, and smart monitoring can significantly reduce emissions. It also emphasizes the role of policy support, stakeholder awareness, and technological innovation in promoting sustainable practices. Overall, the paper concludes that a coordinated and holistic approach is essential for achieving long-term sustainability and carbon neutrality in the construction industry.

  • References

    [1] Andrew, R. M. (2018). Global CO₂ emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data, 10(1), 195–217.

    [2] Hammond, G. P., & Jones, C. I. (2011). Embodied carbon: The inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). Energy Policy, 39(4), 2116–2126.

    [3] ISO 14040. (2006). Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization.

    [4] Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment of building materials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394–416.

    [5] Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007). Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 249–257.

    [6] Habert, G., & Ouellet-Plamondon, C. (2016). Recent update on the environmental impact of geopolymer cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 85, 86–96.

    [7] Naik, T. R. (2008). Sustainability of concrete construction. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 13(2), 98–103.

    [8] Van Damme, H. (2018). Concrete material science: Past, present, and future innovations. Cement and Concrete Research, 112, 5–24.

    [9] Sartori, I., Napolitano, A., & Voss, K. (2012). Net zero energy buildings: A consistent definition framework. Energy and Buildings, 48, 220–232.

    [10] Zhai, X. Q., & Wang, R. Z. (2014). Geothermal and solar hybrid systems for building energy conservation. Renewable Energy, 64, 133–143.

    [11] Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling. John Wiley & Sons.

    [12] Ghaffarianhoseini, A., et al. (2017). Building Information Modeling (BIM) and sustainability. Automation in Construction, 80, 1–15.

    [13] Oti, A. H., Kurul, E., Cheung, F., & Tah, J. H. M. (2016). A framework for carbon reduction policies in construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 794–803.

  • Downloads