Fatigue Failure Prediction in Mechanical Components

  • Authors

    • Dr. Chen Wei Professor, Peking University, China Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30716357/IJMRSE-2020PII2H5N

    Published 08-04-2020

  • Fatigue Failure, Life Prediction, S–N Curve, Fracture Mechanics, Finite Element Analysis, Machine Learning, Damage Accumulation, Structural Durability

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    Fatigue Failure Prediction in Mechanical Components. (2020). International Journal of Modern Research in Science & Engineering, 3(2), 01-15. https://doi.org/10.67228/30716357/IJMRSE-2020PII2H5N
  • Abstract

    Fatigue failure is considered to be one of the most critical forms of failure in mechanically loaded associated components that are characterized by cyclic loading. It takes almost 80-90 percent of the failures of engineering structures and machine elements. Fatigue life estimation is a tricky and tough task due to the unpredictability of the fatigue crack initiation and propagation. In this paper, a detailed exploration of fatigue failure prediction of mechanical components has been developed in terms of experimental, analytical and computational as well. A review and a comparison of traditional stress-life (S ⁸ N), strain-life (ε N), as well as fracture mechanisms-based methods, are discussed, and contrasted with the recent data-driven and machine learning-based methods. The paper focuses on combination of finite element analysis (FEA), material characterization and probabilistic modeling in terms of better fatigue life prediction. It suggests a methodology based on a systematic approach to the problem with the analysis of stress, the model of damage accumulation, and verification with experimental results. To prove the efficiency of the proposed method, simulated case studies of common mechanical elements like shaft, gears, and welded contacts are provided. Findings show that cross-validation models that incorporate physics-based and data-driven methods are less inaccurate and reliable. The paper will be used as a framework of reference by the researcher and practicing engineers involved in fatigue study and structural durability evaluation.

  • References

    [1] Wöhler, A. (1860). Versuche über die Festigkeit der Eisenbahnwagenachsen. Zeitschrift für Bauwesen, 10, 583–614.

    [2] Basquin, O. H. (1910). The exponential law of endurance tests. Proceedings of ASTM, 10, 625–630.

    [3] Coffin, L. F. (1954). A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal. Transactions of ASME, 76, 931–950.

    [4] Manson, S. S. (1953). Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress. NASA Technical Report 1170.

    [5] Morrow, J. (1968). Fatigue properties of metals. In Fatigue Design Handbook, SAE, 21–29.

    [6] Paris, P., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85(4), 528–534.

    [7] Anderson, T. L. (2017). Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications (4th ed.). CRC Press.

    [8] Palmgren, A. (1924). Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern. Zeitschrift des Vereins Deutscher Ingenieure, 68, 339–341.

    [9] Miner, M. A. (1945). Cumulative damage in fatigue. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 12(3), A159–A164.

    [10] Stephens, R. I., Fatemi, A., Stephens, R. R., & Fuchs, H. O. (2000). Metal Fatigue in Engineering (2nd ed.). Wiley.

    [11] Dowling, N. E. (2013). Mechanical Behavior of Materials (4th ed.). Pearson.

    [12] Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.

    [13] Yao, W., & Tian, X. (2018). Fatigue life prediction using machine learning methods. International Journal of Fatigue, 113, 57–67.

    [14] Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Xu, Y. (2020). Deep learning-based fatigue life prediction under variable loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 235, 107–123.

  • Downloads