Smart Robotic Systems for Hazardous Industrial Environments
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2018PII3N6VPublished 11-02-2018
Hazardous environments, industrial robotics, inspection robots, intrinsically safe design, ATEX/IECEx, SLAM, risk-aware autonomy, multi-sensor fusion, digital twins, functional safety, teleoperation, human–robot interaction Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]P. Agarwal and R. Chandra, “Smart Robotic Systems for Hazardous Industrial Environments”, IJIARE, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 01–16, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2018PII3N6V.Abstract
Industrial environments such as petrochemical plants, offshore platforms, mines, and nuclear facilities pose severe risks to human workers, including toxic exposure, explosions, radiation, and extreme conditions. To achieve safer, zero-harm operations, intelligent robotic systems are increasingly deployed for inspection, monitoring, and emergency response in hazardous or inaccessible areas. Recent advancements in multi-modal sensing, autonomous navigation, and industrial connectivity have transformed robots into capable cyber-physical agents.This paper presents an IEEE-style overview of intelligent robots in hazardous industries, structured across platform, perception, decision, communication, and assurance layers. It introduces a Risk-Aware Autonomy (RAA) framework that balances task success with safety constraints using optimization-based control. The study also highlights real-world challenges such as harsh environments, limited reliability of AI models, and certification complexities. Furthermore, the paper outlines a systematic engineering methodology covering hazard analysis, system design, validation, and operational governance. It emphasizes dual assurance—integrating safety and cybersecurity to ensure reliable deployment. Overall, intelligent robotics can significantly reduce human exposure, improve inspection quality, and enable early fault detection, while future research must focus on certifiable AI, resilient perception, and standardized benchmarking in hazardous environments.
References
[1] Kohlbrecher, S., & von Stryk, O. (2016). From RoboCup Rescue to supervised autonomous mobile robots for remote inspection of industrial plants. KI – Künstliche Intelligenz, 30(3–4), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-016-0446-8
[2] Wang, W., Gao, W., Zhao, S., Cao, W., & Du, Z. (2017). Robot Protection in Hazardous Environments. In H. Canbolat (Ed.), Robots Operating in Hazardous Environments. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69619
[3] Almadhoun, R., Taha, T., Seneviratne, L., Dias, J., & Cai, G. (2016). A survey on inspecting structures using robotic systems. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 13(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881416663664
[4] Pérez, L., Rodríguez, Í., Rodríguez, N., Usamentiaga, R., & García, D. F. (2016). Robot guidance using machine vision techniques in industrial environments: A comparative review. Sensors, 16(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16030335
[5] Khalid, A., Kirisci, P., Ghrairi, Z., Thoben, K.-D., & Pannek, J. (2016). A methodology to develop collaborative robotic cyber-physical systems for production environments. Logistics Research, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-016-0151-x
[6] Robla-Gómez, S., Becerra, V. M., Llata, J. R., González-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., & Pérez-Oria, J. (2017). Working together: A review on safe human–robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access, 5, 26754–26773. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2773127
[7] Sheridan, T. B. (2016). Human–robot interaction: Status and challenges. Human Factors, 58(4), 525–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816644364
[8] Guiochet, J. (2016). Hazard analysis of human–robot interactions with HAZOP-UML. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.03139. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03139
[9] Steijn, W. M. P., Luiijf, E., & van der Beek, D. (2016). Emergent risk to workplace safety as a result of the use of robots in the workplace. TNO Technical Report R11488.
[10] Preuveneers, D., & Ilie-Zudor, E. (2017). The intelligent industry of the future: A survey on emerging trends, research challenges and opportunities in Industry 4.0. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 9(3), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-170432
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]P. Agarwal and R. Chandra, “Smart Robotic Systems for Hazardous Industrial Environments”, IJIARE, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 01–16, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2018PII3N6V.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Dr. Pooja Agarwal, Energy-Aware Navigation Strategies for Autonomous Service Robots , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- Dr. Pooja Agarwal, Dr. Rakesh Chandra, Design of Autonomous Inspection Robots for Infrastructure Monitoring , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
- Dr. Rakesh Chandra, Autonomous Navigation Framework for Mobile Robots in Highly Dynamic and Complex Indoor Environments , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- Dr. Pooja Agarwal, Dr. Rakesh Chandra, Adaptive Force Control Strategies for Collaborative Robotic Manipulation , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Similar Articles
- Narendra Karmarkar, P. K. Iyengar, Industry 5.0-Oriented Human-Centric Robotic Manufacturing Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
- Dr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, A Reconfigurable Industrial Robot Architecture for Smart Manufacturing , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
- Samuel O’ Brell, Kelvin Ling, Human–Robot Shared Workspace Safety Enhancement Using Predictive Control , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
- Narendra Karmarkar, Energy-Aware Embedded Intelligence for Smart Robotic Applications , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
- Jean Bartik, Intelligent Motion Compensation Methods for Industrial Robotic Arms , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
- Ole Secher Olesen, Autonomous Robotic Calibration Techniques for High-Precision Manufacturing , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- N. Seshagiri, Autonomous Robotic Calibration Techniques for High-Precision Manufacturing , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- Dr. Nandhini Ravi, Intelligent Robotic Pick-and-Sort Systems for Dynamic Production , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
- Dr. Meena Krishnan, Dr. Arvind Kumar Singh, AI-Based Embedded Controllers for Precision Motion Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
- N. Seshagiri, Adaptive Embedded Control Architectures for Intelligent Mechatronic Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.