Autonomous Robotic Arm Control Using Hybrid Kinematic Optimization
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-V9I1P102Published 01-04-2026
Autonomous Robotics, Robotic Arm Control, Hybrid Kinematic Optimization, Inverse Kinematics, Trajectory Planning, Intelligent Control, Multi-Objective Optimization Issue
Section
ArticlesAbstract
The autonomous robotic manipulators have become inevitable in the contemporary industrial automation, medical robotics, space exploration, and service robots. But it is an inherent challenge to have accurate, active and strong control of robotic arms under dynamic and uncertain conditions. Conventional control techniques utilizing only forward or inverse kinematics have drawbacks of singularities, local minima, sluggish convergence and lack of computational efficiency. In order to solve these problems, the current paper will cover a new autonomous robotic arm control system (ARCs) by relying on a Hybrid Kinematic Optimization(HKO) approach that combines analytical inverse kinematics, numerical optimization, intelligent constraint management. The suggested framework will integrate classical DenavitHartenberg (D-H) kinematic modeling with the use of the gradient-based and evolutionary optimization to produce the optimal joint trajectories in real-time. There is the introduction of a hybrid cost function that involves position accuracy, orientation error, joint smoothness, and energy efficiency. Collision avoidance and workspace constraints are also factored in the control architecture to be used to ensure safe and reliable operation. The hybrid optimizer is a dynamical algorithm that changes between fast analytical solvers and the global numerical optimizers based on the complexity of the task and the environmental conditions. Experiments involving simulation experiments on a 6-DOF model of industrial robotic arm on different task settings, such as pick-and-place settings, obstacle avoidance, and tracking in a trajectory are carried out. Convergence rate, tracking accuracy, joint torque efficiency and computational load are among the performance metrics considered and compared to the more traditional inverse kinematics and pure optimization-based methods. Findings indicate that the suggested hybrid structure attains a maximum speed of convergence is 35 percent, trajectory error is 28 percent and energy use is 22 percent. The Hybrid Kinematic Optimization framework presented provides a robust, scalable and intelligent framework applicable to solve the needs of next generation autonomous robotic manipulators to work within dynamic environments.
References
[1] Denavit, J., & Hartenberg, R. S. (1955).A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 22, 215–221.
[2] Craig, J. J. (2005). Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
[3] Spong, M. W., Hutchinson, S., & Vidyasagar, M. (2006). Robot Modeling and Control. Wiley.
[4] Siciliano, B., Sciavicco, L., Villani, L., & Oriolo, G. (2010).Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control. Springer.
[5] Paul, R. P. (1981). Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control. MIT Press.
[6] Pieper, D. L. (1968). The kinematics of manipulators under computer control. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
[7] Whitney, D. E. (1969). Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 10(2), 47–53.
[8] Chiaverini, S., Siciliano, B., & Egeland, O. (1994). Review of the damped least-squares inverse kinematics. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2(2), 123–134.
[9] Nakamura, Y. (1991). Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization. Addison-Wesley.
[10] Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.
[11] Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley.
[12] Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution – A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 341–359.
[13] Zhang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2013). Inverse kinematics for robot manipulators using particle swarm optimization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29(4), 368–375.
[14] Zhao, J., Gao, F., & Zhang, X. (2017). Hybrid analytical–numerical inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 14(3).
[15] Chen, C. S., & Wang, P. K. (2008). Hybrid inverse kinematics using analytical and numerical methods. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 51(2), 149–168.
Downloads
Similar Articles
- Dr. Matteo Rossi, Robotic Process Automation with ML and Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizing Business Processes , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018)
- Pruthvi Kaluvala, Adaptive AI-Based Multi-Sensor Fusion for Robust ADAS Perception and Real-Time Automotive Safety , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 4 (2026)
- Karthick, Predictive Resource Planning For Energy-Efficient Cloud Computing and Enterprise Workload Management , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026)
- M. Riyaz Mohammed, Swarm-Augmented Federated Reinforcement Learning for Resilient Edge Energy Networks: Adaptive Topology, Distributed Optimization, and Self-Healing Microgrid Coordination , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
- Nalini Sivakumar, Predictive Connectivity Management for Reliable Communication in Intelligent Edge Networks , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026)
- H. N. Mahabala, Hybrid Knowledge Graph and Large Language Model Architectures for Predictive Analytics , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)
- Bhanu Kiran Kumar Muggalla, Enterprise Platform Engineering: An AI-Enabled Framework for Scalable Developer Platforms, Intelligent Infrastructure Automation, and Operational Excellence , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026)
- Rama Subba Rao Nimmala, Building World-Class Compute Platforms: Validation, Quality, and Performance Engineering , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
- VenkataKrishna Brahmam Pogadadanda, Design Optimization Techniques for Xilinx FPGA Memory IPs , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
- Yuga Sai Kiran Reddy Sudini, An Intelligent Agent for Root-Cause Detection and Remediation , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.