Agent-Based Machine Learning Frameworks for Autonomous Predictive Decision Systems
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2021PI2V9CPublished 02-04-2021
Blockchain, Financial Transactions, Distributed Ledger Technology, Cryptocurrency, Smart Contracts, Cybersecurity, Consensus Mechanism, Decentralized Finance Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]L. Pouzin and J. Arsac, “Agent-Based Machine Learning Frameworks for Autonomous Predictive Decision Systems”, IJIARE, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 01–15, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2021PI2V9C.Abstract
The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), autonomous computing, and distributed intelligent systems has transformed predictive decision-making across domains such as healthcare, finance, manufacturing, transportation, cybersecurity, and IoT. However, traditional centralized machine learning models often lack adaptability, scalability, and real-time responsiveness in dynamic environments. This paper proposes an Agent-Based Machine Learning Framework for Autonomous Predictive Decision Systems (ABML-APDS) that integrates autonomous agents, distributed intelligence, machine learning, reinforcement learning, explainable AI (XAI), and continuous learning into a unified architecture. The framework enables decentralized decision-making through intelligent agent collaboration, adaptive model updates, predictive learning, and continuous feedback optimization. Supporting supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement, and deep learning techniques, the proposed framework continuously monitors environmental changes, updates prediction models, and optimizes decision strategies. It is applicable to smart manufacturing, healthcare, finance, cybersecurity, intelligent transportation, and industrial automation. Compared with conventional centralized approaches, ABML-APDS enhances prediction accuracy, scalability, explainability, computational efficiency, fault tolerance, and autonomous decision-making, providing a robust foundation for Industry 5.0, cyber-physical systems, and AI-driven digital transformation.
References
[1] M. Wooldridge, An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2021.
[2] S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson, 2021.
[3] J. Konečný, H. B. McMahan, D. Ramage, and P. Richtárik, "Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Machine Learning Workshops, 2021, pp. 1–10.
[4] Wooldridge, M. (2009). An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
[5] Stone, P., & Veloso, M. (2000). Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective. Autonomous Robots, 8(3), 345–383.
[6] Jennings, N. R., Sycara, K., & Wooldridge, M. (1998). A roadmap of agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(1), 7–38.
[7] Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
[8] Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
[9] Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152.
[10] Weiss, G. (Ed.). (2013). Multiagent Systems (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
[11] Busoniu, L., Babuska, R., & De Schutter, B. (2008). A comprehensive survey of multiagent reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 38(2), 156–172.
[12] Panait, L., & Luke, S. (2005). Cooperative multi-agent learning: The state of the art. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 11(3), 387–434.
[13] Shoham, Y., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2009). Multiagent Systems: Algorithmic, Game-Theoretic, and Logical Foundations. Cambridge University Press.
[14] Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
[15] Bellman, R. E. (1957). Dynamic Programming. Princeton University Press.
[16] Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Moore, A. W. (1996). Reinforcement learning: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4, 237–285.
[17] Ghallab, M., Nau, D., & Traverso, P. (2016). Automated Planning and Acting. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]L. Pouzin and J. Arsac, “Agent-Based Machine Learning Frameworks for Autonomous Predictive Decision Systems”, IJIARE, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 01–15, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.67228/30715725/IJIARE-2021PI2V9C.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Louis Pouzin, Jacques Arsac, Machine Vision-Based Quality Inspection in Robotic Manufacturing Lines , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
- Jacques Arsac, Intelligent Localization Using Vision and Inertial Sensor Fusion , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Similar Articles
- N. Seshagiri, Autonomous Robotic Exploration Using Semantic Environment Mapping , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
- Michael Anderson, Combining Robotic Process Automation with Artificial Intelligence Applications, Terminology, Benefits, and Challenges , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018)
- Dr. Chen Wei, Dr. Liu Fang, Real-Time Path Correction for Assembly Line Robots Using Sensor Fusion , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
- Narendra Karmarkar, P. K. Iyengar, Industry 5.0-Oriented Human-Centric Robotic Manufacturing Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
- Amanda Davis, Kevin Taylor, Design of Energy-Efficient Actuation Systems for Industrial Robots , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019)
- Niklaus Wirth, AI-Enhanced Process Optimization in Automated Production Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024)
- Michael Anderson, AI-Based Adaptive Motion Planning for Autonomous Robotic Systems , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020)
- N. Seshagiri, H. N. Mahabala, Hybrid Deep Learning Frameworks for Robotic Object Recognition , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025)
- David Thompson, Robotic Process Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020)
- Dr. Pooja Agarwal, Dr. Rakesh Chandra, Design of Autonomous Inspection Robots for Infrastructure Monitoring , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.