Trends in Cyber-Physical Security for Smart Factories

  • Authors

    • Dr. Hiroshi Tanaka Professor, University of Tokyo, Japan. Author
    • Dr. Yuki Nakamura Associate Professor, Kyoto University, Japan. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2021PI5W2J

    Published 06-04-2021

  • Cyber-Physical Systems, Smart Factories, Industry 4.0, Industrial Cybersecurity, Operational Technology, Security, Zero Trust Architecture

    Issue

    Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    H. Tanaka and Y. Nakamura, “Trends in Cyber-Physical Security for Smart Factories”, ijmiet, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 01–13, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2021PI5W2J.

  • Abstract

    By Industry 4.0 has resulted in the prevalence of smart factories, in which there is a close relationship between computation, communication, and physical processes through cyber-physical systems (CPS). Even though productivity, flexibility, and efficiency are improved under this integration, new security challenges that have never been experienced previously and go beyond the traditional cybersecurity boundaries are created. Cyber-physical security (CPSec) is the provision of defensive of the cyber components, as well as physical processes against malicious attacks, failures, and system anomalies. The paper is a systematic and multifaceted review of the new trends in cyber-physical security of smart factories. It looks at the threat landscapes, attack vectors, architecture weaknesses, and intersection of the information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) worlds. In addition, the article evaluates the innovative defense systems such as artificial intelligence-based intrusion detection systems, blockchain-based trust management systems, zero-trust-based architectures, and security validation using digital twins. An adaptable, resilient, and real-time threat response-focused layered security approach is suggested to smart manufacturing settings. Recent experimental data on the role of advanced CPSec strategies is presented based on the considerations of industrial case studies and simulations. Lastly, the paper identifies open research problems and future directions requirements in order to establish robust, scale up and smart cyber-physical security systems in next generation smart factories.

  • References

    [1] Lee, E. A., “Cyber physical systems: Design challenges,” Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 2008, pp. 363–369.

    [2] Rajkumar, R., Lee, I., Sha, L., and Stankovic, J., “Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution,” Proceedings of the 47th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, 2010, pp. 731–736.

    [3] Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., and Luo, B., “Cyber-physical systems security—A survey,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1802–1831, 2017.

    [4] Alguliyev, R., Imamverdiyev, Y., and Sukhostat, L., “Cyber–physical systems and their security issues,” Computers in Industry, vol. 100, pp. 212–223, 2018.

    [5] Cárdenas, A. A., Amin, S., and Sastry, S., “Secure control: Towards survivable cyber-physical systems,” Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2008, pp. 495–500.

    [6] Mo, Y., and Sinopoli, B., “False data injection attacks in control systems,” Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Secure Control Systems, CPSWEEK, 2010.

    [7] Teixeira, A., Shames, I., Sandberg, H., and Johansson, K. H., “A secure control framework for resource-limited adversaries,” Automatica, vol. 51, pp. 135–148, 2015.

    [8] Mitchell, R., and Chen, I.-R., “A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 1–29, 2014.

    [9] Giraldo, J., Urbina, D., Cardenas, A. A., Tippenhauer, N. O., Valente, J., Faisal, M., Ruths, J., and Sandberg, H., “A survey of physics-based attack detection in cyber-physical systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1–36, 2018.

    [10] Krotofil, M., and Larsen, J., “Rocking the pocket book: Hacking chemical plants for competition and extortion,” Black Hat USA, 2015.

    [11] Knowles, W., Prince, D., Hutchison, D., Disso, J. F. P., and Jones, K., “A survey of cyber security management in industrial control systems,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, vol. 9, pp. 52–80, 2015.

    [12] Anton, S. D. D., et al., “Anomaly-based intrusion detection in industrial control systems: A survey,” Computers & Security, vol. 77, pp. 385–403, 2018.

    [13] Ding, D., Han, Q.-L., Ge, X., and Zhang, X.-M., “A survey on security control and attack detection for industrial cyber–physical systems,” Neurocomputing, vol. 275, pp. 1674–1683, 2018.

    [14] Kang, M. J., Kim, J. W., Jeong, J. I., Kim, J. H., and Cho, J. S., “A survey of security issues in cyber-physical systems,” Journal of Information Processing Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 377–402, 2015.

    [15] Adepu, S., and Mathur, A., “Distributed attack detection in a water treatment plant: Method and case study,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 65–79, 2018.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

51-60 of 79

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.