Assessing User Experience Trends in Next-Gen Mobile Applications

  • Authors

    • Dr. Hiroshi Tanaka Professor, University of Tokyo, Japan. Author
    • Dr. Yuki Nakamura Associate Professor, Kyoto University, Japan. Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2022PI6C4H

    Published 05-04-2022

  • User Experience, Mobile Applications, Next-Generation Systems, Human–Computer Interaction, UX Trends, Mobile Computing

    Issue

    Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    H. Tanaka and Y. Nakamura, “Assessing User Experience Trends in Next-Gen Mobile Applications”, ijmiet, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 01–15, May 2022, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2022PI6C4H.

  • Abstract

    The User Experience (UX) has become one of the come-or-go factors in the successful next-generation mobile applications as users demand more of a smooth, personalized, and smart interactions. The recent rapid innovations in mobile hardware, mobile network infrastructure, including 5G, artificial intelligence (AI), augmented reality (AR) and edge computing have had a significant impact on the way users engage with their mobile systems. This paper will provide an in-depth evaluation of modern trends in user experience in the next generation mobile app based on usability, accessibility, performance, personalisation as well as trust. The paper summarizes the existing scholarly and industry research, determines the prevailing UX paradigms, and assesses them within the framework of application design and programming. It suggests a systematic approach that involves the use of qualitative analysis, comparative analysis and operational metrics based evaluation to analyze the UX trends in various areas of application such as medical services, financial services, education, and entertainment. The results also spot the trend towards adaptive interfaces, utilizing AI to create a personalized experience, using both multimodal and minimalist interactions and privacy as one of the primary UX determinants. Moreover, the trade-offs between innovation and usability are highlighted, and the main problems that developers have to deal with balancing between performance, security, and user satisfaction. This paper ends with details of the future research and recommendations that can be adopted by designers, developers, and researchers who would like to create user-friendly next-generation mobile applications.

  • References

    [1] ISO 9241-210. (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization.

    [2] Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.

    [3] Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience – A research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.

    [4] Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised ed.). Basic Books.

    [5] Zhang, D., & Adipat, B. (2005). Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 18(3), 293–308.

    [6] Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2016). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human–computer interaction. Pearson.

    [7] Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., & Aarts, E. (2015). Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 77, 38–51.

    [8] Amershi, S., et al. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13.

    [9] Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends in Human–Computer Interaction, 8(2–3), 73–272.

    [10] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    [11] Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.

    [12] Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, 63–76.

    [13] Lazar, J., Goldstein, D. F., & Taylor, A. (2015). Ensuring digital accessibility through process and policy. Morgan Kaufmann.

    [14] W3C. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. World Wide Web Consortium.

    [15] Bødker, S. (2006). When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction, 1–8.

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

71-80 of 80

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.