AI-Assisted Drug Discovery: Emerging Technologies and Challenges

  • Authors

    • Joseph Robin Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, Kristu Jayanti College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Author
    • Tamilarasan Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, Kristu Jayanti College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Author

    DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2025PI3S4J

    Published 04-04-2025

  • Artificial Intelligence, Drug Discovery, Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Molecular Modeling, Generative AI, Pharmaceutical Research, Drug Development, Predictive Analytics, Bioinformatics

    Issue

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    J. Robin and Tamilarasan, “AI-Assisted Drug Discovery: Emerging Technologies and Challenges”, ijmiet, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 01–14, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.67228/30715628/IJMIET-2025PI3S4J.
  • Abstract

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming drug discovery by making the process faster, more cost-effective, and more accurate than traditional methods, which often require 10–15 years and billions of dollars to develop a new drug. AI techniques such as machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, reinforcement learning, and generative AI are widely used for drug target identification, biomarker discovery, molecular screening, toxicity prediction, lead optimization, and clinical trial support. Advanced models including Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests (RF), Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Graph Neural Networks (GNN), and Transformers improve the prediction of molecular properties and drug-target interactions, while generative AI enables the design of novel therapeutic molecules. This study reviews AI-driven drug discovery methods, presents a structured AI pipeline from data collection to candidate selection, and evaluates performance using metrics such as prediction accuracy, screening efficiency, lead optimization success, and toxicity reduction. Despite its advantages, AI faces challenges including limited high-quality datasets, model bias, interpretability, regulatory uncertainty, computational complexity, and integration with conventional laboratory workflows. The findings indicate that AI significantly improves drug discovery efficiency, reduces research costs, and accelerates pharmaceutical innovation. Future advancements will rely on explainable AI, multimodal biological data integration, federated learning, and stronger regulatory frameworks.

  • References

    [1] P. Chen, T. Li, and X. Wang, “Machine learning methods for drug-target interaction prediction,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2021.

    [2] H. Vamathevan, D. Clark, P. Czodrowski, et al., “Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 463–477, 2019.

    [3] A. Zhavoronkov, Y. A. Ivanenkov, A. Aliper, et al., “Deep learning enables rapid identification of potent DDR1 kinase inhibitors,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1038–1040, 2019.

    [4] M. Rifaioglu, E. Atas, M. J. Martin, et al., “Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1089–1098, 2019.

    [5] J. Jiménez-Luna, F. Grisoni, and G. Schneider, “Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligence,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 573–584, 2020.

    [6] D. Rogers and M. Hahn, “Extended-connectivity fingerprints,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 742–754, 2010.

    [7] Z. Wu, B. Ramsundar, E. N. Feinberg, et al., “MoleculeNet: A benchmark for molecular machine learning,” Chemical Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 513–530, 2018.

    [8] T. Gaudelet, B. Day, A. Jamasb, et al., “Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development,” Briefings in Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1–17, 2021.

    [9] D. Duvenaud, D. Maclaurin, J. Aguilera-Iparraguirre, et al., “Convolutional networks on graphs for learning molecular fingerprints,” in Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2015, pp. 2224–2232.

    [10] N. Brown, M. Fiscato, M. H. Segler, and A. Vaucher, “GuacaMol: Benchmarking models for de novo molecular design,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1096–1108, 2019.

    [11] R. Gómez-Bombarelli, J. N. Wei, D. Duvenaud, et al., “Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules,” ACS Central Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 268–276, 2018.

    [12] M. H. S. Segler, T. Kogej, C. Tyrchan, and M. P. Waller, “Generating focused molecule libraries for drug discovery with recurrent neural networks,” ACS Central Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 120–131, 2018.

    [13] A. Elton, Z. Boukouvalas, M. Fuge, and P. Chung, “Deep learning for molecular design—A review of the state of the art,” Molecular Systems Design & Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 828–849, 2019.

    [14] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, pp. 436–444, 2015.

    [15] K. Yang, K. Swanson, W. Jin, et al., “Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction,” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 3370–3388, 2019.

    [16] Gajula, S. (2023). A review of anomaly identification in finance frauds using machine learning system. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 13(6), 568–575. https://ijcet.evegenis.org/index.php/ijcet/article/view/820

    [17] Gajula, S. (2024). Adaptive zero trust architecture for securing financial microservices. Computer Fraud & Security, 2024(12), 643–655. https://doi.org/10.52710/cfs.845

    [18] Gajula, S. (2024). Cybersecurity risk prediction using graph neural networks. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management

  • Downloads

Similar Articles

1-10 of 74

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.