Semantic-AI Framework for Automated Metadata Generation in Digital Asset Management
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715636/WCMEAI-2025P113Published 03-22-2025
Semantic AI, Digital Asset Management (DAM), Metadata Automation, Knowledge Graphs, NLP, Computer Vision, Ontology Engineering, Machine Learning, Content Classification, Information Retrieval Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]S. S. K. Suryadevara, “Semantic-AI Framework for Automated Metadata Generation in Digital Asset Management”, IJETMR, pp. 202–218, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.67228/30715636/WCMEAI-2025P113.Abstract
The mounting need for accurate, consistent and scalable metadata generation has newly come to the fore as digital enterprises, on a continuous basis, generate massive volumes of images, videos, documents and creative assets. On the one hand, traditional Digital Asset Management (DAM) systems are still heavily dependent on manual tagging. On the other hand, they are linked with rudimentary rule-based tools, which, however, cannot cope with large and diversified datasets and frequently generate inconsistent or shallow metadata. Such inherent drawbacks are influencing the aspects of asset discoverability, search quality, and personalization, as well as the downstream automation process. In response to these issues, the present document proposes a Semantic-AI Framework for automated metadata generation in which technologies comprise natural language understanding, computer vision, knowledge graphs and contextual reasoning on a higher level of integration. The framework tags raw assets with semantically meaningful tags, attribute sets, contextual descriptors, and relationship mappings that go far beyond simple keyword extraction. From a methodological viewpoint, the system integrates multimodal AI models for content interpretation, a semantic ontology layer for domain alignment, and an adaptive learning mechanism that refines metadata quality using human-in-the-loop validation. The experimental results reveal that the framework delivers its promises in terms of accuracy, depth, and contextual relevance, especially for complex or ambiguous assets, on a regular basis. The improvements in cataloging workflows and asset retrieval precision across different content types are also highlighted by the paper. Moreover, the organization can readily accommodate the evolving taxonomies, the brand guidelines or the industry-specific requirements through the interplay of the 'feedback loops' and the framework without major reengineering. On the one hand, the study shows the potential of Semantic-AI to revolutionize the DAM environment through the support of dynamic taxonomies, cross-asset reasoning, predictive tagging, and intelligent content recommendations.
References
[1] Alkhard, Ahmed. "Enhancing asset management through integrated facilities data, digital asset management, and metadata strategies." Construction Economics and Building 24.3 (2024): 76-94.
[2] Humphrey, Clinton D., Travis T. Tollefson, and J. David Kriet. "Digital asset management." Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics 18.2 (2010): 335-340.
[3] Hosseini, M. Reza, Belinda Hodkinson, and Julie Jupp. "Digital asset management: a proof of concept for an automated change roadmap generator." Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Construction Application of Virtual Reality. 2021.
[4] Batcheller, James K. "Automating geospatial metadata generation—An integrated data management and documentation approach." Computers & Geosciences 34.4 (2008): 387-398.
[5] West, Dony, Caitlin Denny, and Rebecca Ruud. "Case study: Integrating artificial intelligence metadata within Paramount’s digital asset management system." Journal of Digital Media Management 9.3 (2021): 198-208.
[6] Barnes, Mary Katherine, et al. "The sorting of competing metadata models in digital asset management." Journal of Digital Media Management 1.1 (2012): 78-84.
[7] Truong, Vu Tuan, Long Le, and Dusit Niyato. "Blockchain meets metaverse and digital asset management: A comprehensive survey." Ieee Access 11 (2023): 26258-26288.
[8] Bekaert, Jeroen, and Herbert Van de Sompel. "A standards-based solution for the accurate transfer of digital assets." D-Lib Magazine 11.6 (2005): 1082-9873.
[9] Ochoa, Xavier, and Erik Duval. "Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories." International journal on digital libraries 10.2 (2009): 67-91.
[10] Park, Jung-Ran. "Metadata quality in digital repositories: A survey of the current state of the art." Cataloging & classification quarterly 47.3-4 (2009): 213-228.
[11] Makhlouf Shabou, Basma, et al. "Algorithmic methods to explore the automation of the appraisal of structured and unstructured digital data." Records management journal 30.2 (2020): 175-200.
[12] Wactlar, Howard D., and Michael G. Christel. "Digital video archives: Managing through metadata." Building a national strategy for digital preservation: Issues in digital media archiving 84 (2002): 99.
[13] Patel, Manjula, et al. "Metadata requirements for digital museum environments." International Journal on Digital Libraries 5.3 (2005): 179-192.
[14] Park, Jung-ran, and Yuji Tosaka. "Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability." Information Technology and Libraries 29.3 (2010): 104-116.
[15] Farghaly, Karim, et al. "Taxonomy for BIM and asset management semantic interoperability." Journal of Management in Engineering 34.4 (2018): 04018012.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]S. S. K. Suryadevara, “Semantic-AI Framework for Automated Metadata Generation in Digital Asset Management”, IJETMR, pp. 202–218, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.67228/30715636/WCMEAI-2025P113.