Explainable Artificial Intelligence for ESG Performance Assessment and Sustainability Reporting
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67228/30715636/IJETMR-2024PII9T5RPublished 12-04-2024
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Environmental Social Governance (ESG), Sustainability Reporting, Explainable Machine Learning, ESG Analytics, Responsible Artificial Intelligence, Corporate Sustainability, Decision Support Systems, Sustainable Finance, Feature Attribution, ESG Scoring, Regulatory Compliance Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]S. N, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence for ESG Performance Assessment and Sustainability Reporting”, IJETMR, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 01–16, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.67228/30715636/IJETMR-2024PII9T5R.Abstract
Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance assessment evaluates an organization's sustainability by measuring its environmental responsibility, social impact, and governance practices. Environmental indicators include carbon emissions, energy efficiency, water conservation, waste management, and biodiversity protection. Social assessment focuses on employee welfare, diversity, human rights, customer satisfaction, and community engagement, while governance evaluates board accountability, ethical conduct, transparency, compliance, risk management, and anti-corruption measures. ESG reporting enables organizations to communicate their sustainability performance to investors, regulators, customers, and other stakeholders using globally recognized reporting frameworks. These reports improve transparency, accountability, regulatory compliance, and support responsible investment decisions. With the rapid growth of digital data from ERP systems, IoT devices, supply chains, environmental monitoring, and financial systems, organizations face challenges in data integration and analysis. To overcome these challenges, businesses increasingly adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), and data analytics to automate ESG assessment, improve reporting accuracy, enhance decision-making, and strengthen long-term sustainable business growth and corporate governance.
References
[1] G. Serafeim, "ESG: Hyperbolic Discounting and Sustainability Reporting," IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 18–27, 2022.
[2] A. Rai, "Explainable AI: From Black Box to Glass Box," Journal of the ACM, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–36, 2022.
[3] M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, "Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 98–104, 2021.
[4] S. Lundberg and S. Lee, "A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions," IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 188–201, 2022.
[5] Y. Zhao, X. Liu, and J. Wang, "Artificial Intelligence for ESG Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 112315–112334, 2022.
[6] H. Chen, P. Zhang, and L. Xu, "Machine Learning-Based ESG Risk Assessment for Sustainable Finance," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 45882–45896, 2023.
[7] J. Sun, R. Li, and K. Zhou, "Explainable Deep Learning for Sustainable Investment Decision Support," IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1058–1070, 2023.
[8] X. Wang, Y. Li, and M. Chen, "Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Sustainable Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges," IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 93415–93435, 2023.
[9] M. Ahmed, S. Rahman, and K. Hassan, "Deep Learning Framework for ESG Rating Prediction Using Multi-Source Data," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 11240–11258, 2024.
[10] L. Zhang, Y. Chen, and Z. Wu, "AI-Driven Sustainability Analytics for Corporate ESG Performance," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 71, pp. 1452–1465, 2024.
[11] P. Kumar, R. Sharma, and A. Verma, "Explainable Ensemble Learning for ESG Risk Prediction in Financial Institutions," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 67345–67361, 2024.
Downloads
How to Cite
[1]S. N, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence for ESG Performance Assessment and Sustainability Reporting”, IJETMR, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 01–16, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.67228/30715636/IJETMR-2024PII9T5R.