Autonomous Robotic Arm Control Using Hybrid Kinematic Optimization
-
Published 2026-01-04
Autonomous Robotics, Robotic Arm Control, Hybrid Kinematic Optimization, Inverse Kinematics, Trajectory Planning, Intelligent Control, Multi-Objective Optimization Issue
Section
ArticlesHow to Cite
[1]Hyeon-Woo-Lee and K. Seok-Park, “Autonomous Robotic Arm Control Using Hybrid Kinematic Optimization”, IJIARE, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jan. 2026, Accessed: Mar. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://worldcometresearchgroup.com/index.php/ijiare/article/view/82Abstract
The autonomous robotic manipulators have become inevitable in the contemporary industrial automation, medical robotics, space exploration, and service robots. But it is an inherent challenge to have accurate, active and strong control of robotic arms under dynamic and uncertain conditions. Conventional control techniques utilizing only forward or inverse kinematics have drawbacks of singularities, local minima, sluggish convergence and lack of computational efficiency. In order to solve these problems, the current paper will cover a new autonomous robotic arm control system (ARCs) by relying on a Hybrid Kinematic Optimization(HKO) approach that combines analytical inverse kinematics, numerical optimization, intelligent constraint management. The suggested framework will integrate classical DenavitHartenberg (D-H) kinematic modeling with the use of the gradient-based and evolutionary optimization to produce the optimal joint trajectories in real-time. There is the introduction of a hybrid cost function that involves position accuracy, orientation error, joint smoothness, and energy efficiency. Collision avoidance and workspace constraints are also factored in the control architecture to be used to ensure safe and reliable operation. The hybrid optimizer is a dynamical algorithm that changes between fast analytical solvers and the global numerical optimizers based on the complexity of the task and the environmental conditions. Experiments involving simulation experiments on a 6-DOF model of industrial robotic arm on different task settings, such as pick-and-place settings, obstacle avoidance, and tracking in a trajectory are carried out. Convergence rate, tracking accuracy, joint torque efficiency and computational load are among the performance metrics considered and compared to the more traditional inverse kinematics and pure optimization-based methods. Findings indicate that the suggested hybrid structure attains a maximum speed of convergence is 35 percent, trajectory error is 28 percent and energy use is 22 percent. The Hybrid Kinematic Optimization framework presented provides a robust, scalable and intelligent framework applicable to solve the needs of next generation autonomous robotic manipulators to work within dynamic environments.
References
[1] Denavit, J., & Hartenberg, R. S. (1955).A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 22, 215–221.
[2] Craig, J. J. (2005). Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
[3] Spong, M. W., Hutchinson, S., & Vidyasagar, M. (2006). Robot Modeling and Control. Wiley.
[4] Siciliano, B., Sciavicco, L., Villani, L., & Oriolo, G. (2010).Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control. Springer.
[5] Paul, R. P. (1981). Robot Manipulators: Mathematics, Programming, and Control. MIT Press.
[6] Pieper, D. L. (1968). The kinematics of manipulators under computer control. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
[7] Whitney, D. E. (1969). Resolved motion rate control of manipulators and human prostheses. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 10(2), 47–53.
[8] Chiaverini, S., Siciliano, B., & Egeland, O. (1994). Review of the damped least-squares inverse kinematics. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2(2), 123–134.
[9] Nakamura, Y. (1991). Advanced Robotics: Redundancy and Optimization. Addison-Wesley.
[10] Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.
[11] Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley.
[12] Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution – A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 341–359.
[13] Zhang, Y., & Chen, Y. (2013). Inverse kinematics for robot manipulators using particle swarm optimization. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 29(4), 368–375.
[14] Zhao, J., Gao, F., & Zhang, X. (2017). Hybrid analytical–numerical inverse kinematics for redundant manipulators. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 14(3).
[15] Chen, C. S., & Wang, P. K. (2008). Hybrid inverse kinematics using analytical and numerical methods. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 51(2), 149–168.
Downloads
- ga
How to Cite
[1]Hyeon-Woo-Lee and K. Seok-Park, “Autonomous Robotic Arm Control Using Hybrid Kinematic Optimization”, IJIARE, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–25, Jan. 2026, Accessed: Mar. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://worldcometresearchgroup.com/index.php/ijiare/article/view/82
Similar Articles
- Dr. Martinez Finigan, Development of a Cost-Efficient 6-DoF Service Robot , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
- Rafel Merchant, Philip Rogdrez, Design of a Modular Robotic Manipulator for Multi-Task Industrial Operations , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
- Dr. Brian Ngozi, Adaptive Gripping Mechanisms for Precision Robotics Applications , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
- Samuel O’ Brell, Kelvin Ling, Human–Robot Shared Workspace Safety Enhancement Using Predictive Control , International Journal of Intelligent Automation & Robotics Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.