The Role of AI in Enhancing Teaching–Learning Practices across Disciplines

  • Authors

    • Dr. Charles Arockiasamy Assistant Professor, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. Author
    • Dr. A. Priya Assistant Professor, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India. Author

    Published 2026-01-04

  • Artificial Intelligence, Pedagogy, Adaptive Learning, Cognitive Analytics, Teaching–Learning Practices, Educational Technology, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Multidisciplinary Education

    Issue

    Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026)

    Section

    Articles

    How to Cite

    [1]
    C. Arockiasamy and P. A., “The Role of AI in Enhancing Teaching–Learning Practices across Disciplines”, IJETMR, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–30, Jan. 2026, Accessed: Mar. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://worldcometresearchgroup.com/index.php/ijetmr/article/view/87

  • Abstract

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming teaching–learning practices by enabling personalized, data-driven, and scalable educational environments aligned with Industry 4.0. AI-based tools such as adaptive learning systems, intelligent tutoring, automated assessment, simulations, and predictive analytics address key limitations of traditional education, including one-to-many instruction, delayed feedback, and limited learner engagement. Across disciplines engineering, healthcare, humanities, social sciences, and management—AI supports contextual and experiential learning through virtual labs, NLP-based feedback, decision-support systems, and immersive technologies. Beyond instruction, AI enhances institutional functions such as learner analytics, dropout prediction, curriculum optimization, and inclusive education. This paper reviews recent research and proposes an AI-Integrated Pedagogical Enhancement Model (AI-IPEM). Empirical findings indicate improvements in learning efficiency (22–45%), feedback turnaround time (70–90%), student retention (10–18%), and learning compliance (30–50%). The study concludes that AI serves as an enabler of augmented pedagogy, complementing teachers and fostering higher-order thinking, creativity, and lifelong learning.

  • References

    [1] B. P. Woolf, Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing e-Learning. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2009.

    [2] C. Piech et al., “Deep knowledge tracing,” in Proc. NIPS, Montreal, 2015, pp. 505–513.

    [3] Y. Wang, M. Heffernan, and N. Heffernan, “Toward better student modeling: Deep knowledge tracing and dynamic student classification,” J. Educ. Data Mining, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2016.

    [4] G. Siemens and D. Gasevic, “Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration,” in Proc. LAK, 2012, pp. 252–254.

    [5] K. VanLehn, “The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 197–221, 2011.

    [6] J. C. Lester et al., “Designing conversational ITS to enhance learning: Analytics and adaptivity,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 158–200, 2018.M. Chen et al., “Recommender systems for personalized learning: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 198–217, 2021.

    [7] P. Brusilovsky and E. Millán, “User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems,” in The Adaptive Web, LNCS 4321. Berlin: Springer, 2007, pp. 3–53.

    [8] A. Xiong et al., “Automated essay scoring and the future of formative assessment,” Comput. Educ., vol. 161, pp. 104–102, 2021.

    [9] J. Burstein, D. Tetreault, and T. Madnani, “The evolution of automated writing evaluation,” in Handbook of Writing Research, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2016, pp. 308–322.

    [10] A. E. Williamson, “Machine scoring of student essays: A literature review,” Assess. Educ., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2018.

    [11] D. Tempelaar et al., “Predictive learning analytics in blended learning: Monitoring student performance,” J. Educ. Data Mining, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 20–50, 2017.

    [12] ] C. Brooks and C. Thompson, “Predictive modeling in education,” in Learning Analytics Handbook, New York, NY: Springer, 2020, pp. 329–345.

    [13] S. Slade and P. Prinsloo, “Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas,” Amer. Behav. Sci., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1510–1529, 2013.

    [14] R. Papamitsiou and A. A. Economides, “Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 21, pp. 955–989, 2016.

  • Downloads

    • ga